Treatment, Posttreatment, and Total Vertical Dental Changes of the Maxillary and Mandibular Molars and Incisors
Do orthopedic treatments for growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients lead to stable outcomes? (12)
author: Andreas Tjandra, drg | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 1.
Treatment, Posttreatment, and Total Vertical Dental Changes of the Maxillary and Mandibular Molars and Incisors
Treatment Group
Control Group
Difference Probability
50th
25th
75th
50th
25th
75th
Treatment (T1–T2)
U6 ⊥ PP
−0.44
−1.83
0.70
2.85
1.70
4.33
<.001
U1 ⊥ PP
2.85
1.43
4.23
1.25
−0.20
2.10
.006
L6 ⊥ MP
0.65
−0.95
2.20
2.90
2.05
3.68
.001
L1 ⊥ MP
−0.05
−1.43
1.48
2.80
1.00
3.80
.001
Post−treatment (T2–T3)
U6 ⊥ PP
0.95
0.18
1.48
0.35
−0.15
0.98
.231
U1 ⊥ PP
0.00
−0.88
0.40
0.60
−0.20
0.90
.029
L6 ⊥ MP
0.50
−0.45
0.95
0.25
−0.10
1.25
.899
L1 ⊥ MP
0.30
−0.80
0.53
0.50
0.00
0.80
.083
Total change (T1–T3)
U6 ⊥ PP
0.50
−1.95
1.78
3.30
1.35
4.50
<.001
U1 ⊥ PP
2.65
1.83
3.33
1.40
0.80
3.00
.042
L6 ⊥ MP
0.00
−0.30
1.93
3.70
2.13
4.95
<.001
L1 ⊥ MP
0.40
−1.90
1.85
3.30
1.20
4.20
<.001
*
Bold indicates statistically significant (P < .05) within-group changes over time.
Serial posts:
-
A Comprehensive Analysis of Adult Tooth Removal Reasons (12)
-
Alasan Mencabut Gigi Dewasa (12)
-
IOPA Immediately after Crown cementation
-
Implants supported prosthesis in occlusion
-
Making space for missing middle incisor (13)
-
Do orthopedic treatments for growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients lead to stable outcomes? (12)
Table 1.
Treatment, Posttreatment, and Total Vertical Dental Changes of the Maxillary and Mandibular Molars and Incisors
| Treatment Group |
Control Group |
Difference Probability |
|||||
| 50th |
25th |
75th |
50th |
25th |
75th |
||
| Treatment (T1–T2) | |||||||
| U6 ⊥ PP | −0.44 | −1.83 | 0.70 | 2.85 | 1.70 | 4.33 | <.001 |
| U1 ⊥ PP | 2.85 | 1.43 | 4.23 | 1.25 | −0.20 | 2.10 | .006 |
| L6 ⊥ MP | 0.65 | −0.95 | 2.20 | 2.90 | 2.05 | 3.68 | .001 |
| L1 ⊥ MP | −0.05 | −1.43 | 1.48 | 2.80 | 1.00 | 3.80 | .001 |
| Post−treatment (T2–T3) | |||||||
| U6 ⊥ PP | 0.95 | 0.18 | 1.48 | 0.35 | −0.15 | 0.98 | .231 |
| U1 ⊥ PP | 0.00 | −0.88 | 0.40 | 0.60 | −0.20 | 0.90 | .029 |
| L6 ⊥ MP | 0.50 | −0.45 | 0.95 | 0.25 | −0.10 | 1.25 | .899 |
| L1 ⊥ MP | 0.30 | −0.80 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.80 | .083 |
| Total change (T1–T3) | |||||||
| U6 ⊥ PP | 0.50 | −1.95 | 1.78 | 3.30 | 1.35 | 4.50 | <.001 |
| U1 ⊥ PP | 2.65 | 1.83 | 3.33 | 1.40 | 0.80 | 3.00 | .042 |
| L6 ⊥ MP | 0.00 | −0.30 | 1.93 | 3.70 | 2.13 | 4.95 | <.001 |
| L1 ⊥ MP | 0.40 | −1.90 | 1.85 | 3.30 | 1.20 | 4.20 | <.001 |
*
Bold indicates statistically significant (P < .05) within-group changes over time.
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Adult Tooth Removal Reasons (12)
- Alasan Mencabut Gigi Dewasa (12)
- IOPA Immediately after Crown cementation
- Implants supported prosthesis in occlusion
- Making space for missing middle incisor (13)
- Do orthopedic treatments for growing retrognathic hyperdivergent patients lead to stable outcomes? (12)