Figure 1. a Mercury porosimetry and the average pore diameter of the prepared implants. b EDX analysis of hybrid–zirconia surface showing peaks of zirconia, calcium, and phosphate. Ca/P ratio is 1.67. c XRD peaks of uncoated and bioactive implants showing characteristic peaks specific for tetragonal yttrium zirconium oxide crystal system represented by (101), (112), (200), and (211) and hybrid implants showing characteristic peaks specific for hexagonal HA crystal system. d Atomic force microscope of selective infiltration etching zirconia surface demonstrating subsurface porosities
Figure 1. Mercury porosimetry and the average pore diameter of the prepared implants
author: Dawlat Mostafa, Moustafa Aboushelib | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Serial posts:
- Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Background : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Methods : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Results : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Discussion : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- References : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Figure 1. Mercury porosimetry and the average pore diameter of the prepared implants
- Figure 2. SEM image, ×10,000, demonstrating the characteristic porous surface
- Figure 3. Stained histomorphometric section
- Figure 4. Bone implant contact of different test groups