Figure 2. a SEM image, ×10,000, demonstrating the characteristic porous surface of selective infiltration etching surface of zirconia. b SEM image, ×500, demonstrating deposition of PRP coat and complete filling of the porous surface. c SEM image, ×500, demonstrating filling of the porous surface with particles of HA
Figure 4. Bone implant contact of different test groups
author: Dawlat Mostafa, Moustafa Aboushelib | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Figure 4. Bone implant contact of different test groups
Serial posts:
-
Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
Background : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
Methods : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
Results : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
Discussion : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
References : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
-
Figure 1. Mercury porosimetry and the average pore diameter of the prepared implants
-
Figure 2. SEM image, ×10,000, demonstrating the characteristic porous surface
-
Figure 3. Stained histomorphometric section
-
Figure 4. Bone implant contact of different test groups
- Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Background : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Methods : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Results : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Discussion : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- References : Bioactive–hybrid–zirconia implant surface
- Figure 1. Mercury porosimetry and the average pore diameter of the prepared implants
- Figure 2. SEM image, ×10,000, demonstrating the characteristic porous surface
- Figure 3. Stained histomorphometric section
- Figure 4. Bone implant contact of different test groups