Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Virtual 3-dimensional model of a lower jawa of region 35, based on a randomly chosen computerized tomography scan with a total of 212 transversal slices wit 0.25 mm in length, consisting of medullar bone covered by a 1.0-mm thick layer of cortical bone, designed with the software Ansys DesignModeler v11 (ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA)

Table 1: Overview of an in vitro 3-dimensional finite element study

author: Andreas Schwitalla, DDS Wolf-Dieter Mller, PhD | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Author Sarot et al
Year of publication 2009
Implantation site Virtual 3-dimensional model of a lower jawa of region 35, based on a randomly chosen computerized tomography scan with a total of 212 transversal slices wit 0.25 mm in length, consisting of medullar bone covered by a 1.0-mm thick layer of cortical bone, designed with the software Ansys DesignModeler v11 (ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA)
Simulation software Ansys Workbench V11 finite elements simulation software (ANSYS Inc)
Implant design Screwed cylindrical implant with a hexagon connection
Implant dimensions, mm Diameter: 4.1; length: 10
Surface modification N.R.
Roughness RA, μm N.R.
Abutment design Outer hexagon
Abutment dimensions, mm 4.1, bottom platform with upper conic portion
Connection abutment/ implant Titanium bolt with screws in the lower third
Prosthesis Chrome-cobalt structure with a thickness of at least 0.3 mm, covered by feldsplathic porcelain with coronary share, an approximately 0.1-mm thick line of zinc phosphate cements was located between prosthesis and abutment
Implant material
Titanium CFR-PEEK with 30% carbon fiber
Elastic modulus, GPa; 
110 18
Poisson ratio
0.35 0.39
Abutment material
Titanium CFR-PPEK Titanium CFR-PEEK
Stress peaks in the different structures with vertical loads in relation to the long axes of the tooth with 100 N in magnitude, MPa
von Mises implant 76.46;
von Mises abutment 41.76;
tensil cortical/ medullar 32.70/ 2.48,
compression cortical/ medullar 81.14/3.19
von Mises implant 74.70;
von Mises abutment 33.82;
tensile cortical/ medullar 32.70/2.47,
compression cortical/ medullar 81.04/3.19
von Mises implant 85.54;
von Mises abutment 41.32;
tensile cortical/medullar
27.77/4.22, compression cortical/ medullar 89.47/ 3.58
von Mises implant 86.61;
von Mises abutment 33.96;
tensile cortical/ medullar 27.90/ 4.2,
compression cortical/ medullar 86.57/3.6
Tension peaks in the different structures with oblique load direction (30 deg) in relation to the long axis of the tooth with 100 N in magnitude, MPa
von Mises implant 171.42;
von Mises abutment 84.82;
tensile cortical/ medullar 22.02/ 2.65,
compression cortical/ medullar 146.26/ 3.95
von Mises implant 172.02;
von Mises abutment 69.96;
tensile cortical / medullar 21.85 / 2.65, compression cortical/ medullar 146.04 / 3.96
von Mises implant 188.95;
von Mises abutment 84.17;
tensile cortical/ medullar 58.82/ 4.90,
compression cortical/ medullar 177.81/ 6.42
von Mises implant 189.72;
von Mises abutment 69.41;
tensile cortical/ medullar 57.53/ 4.89, compression cortical/ medullar 177.58/ 6.44
   

N.R. indicated nor reported

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in