Virtual 3-dimensional model of a lower jawa of region 35, based on a randomly chosen computerized tomography scan with a total of 212 transversal slices wit 0.25 mm in length, consisting of medullar bone covered by a 1.0-mm thick layer of cortical bone, designed with the software Ansys DesignModeler v11 (ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA)
Table 1: Overview of an in vitro 3-dimensional finite element study
author: Andreas Schwitalla, DDS Wolf-Dieter Mller, PhD | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Author |
Sarot et al |
Year of publication |
2009 |
Implantation site |
Virtual 3-dimensional model of a lower jawa of region 35, based on a randomly chosen computerized tomography scan with a total of 212 transversal slices wit 0.25 mm in length, consisting of medullar bone covered by a 1.0-mm thick layer of cortical bone, designed with the software Ansys DesignModeler v11 (ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA) |
Simulation software |
Ansys Workbench V11 finite elements simulation software (ANSYS Inc) |
Implant design |
Screwed cylindrical implant with a hexagon connection |
Implant dimensions, mm |
Diameter: 4.1; length: 10 |
Surface modification |
N.R. |
Roughness RA, μm |
N.R. |
Abutment design |
Outer hexagon |
Abutment dimensions, mm |
4.1, bottom platform with upper conic portion |
Connection abutment/ implant |
Titanium bolt with screws in the lower third |
Prosthesis |
Chrome-cobalt structure with a thickness of at least 0.3 mm, covered by feldsplathic porcelain with coronary share, an approximately 0.1-mm thick line of zinc phosphate cements was located between prosthesis and abutment |
Implant material |
Titanium |
CFR-PEEK with 30% carbon fiber |
|
Elastic modulus, GPa; |
|
Poisson ratio |
|
Abutment material |
Titanium |
CFR-PPEK |
Titanium |
CFR-PEEK |
|
Stress peaks in the different structures with vertical loads in relation to the long axes of the tooth with 100 N in magnitude, MPa |
von Mises implant 76.46; von Mises abutment 41.76; tensil cortical/ medullar 32.70/ 2.48, compression cortical/ medullar 81.14/3.19 |
von Mises implant 74.70; von Mises abutment 33.82; tensile cortical/ medullar 32.70/2.47, compression cortical/ medullar 81.04/3.19 |
von Mises implant 85.54; von Mises abutment 41.32; tensile cortical/medullar 27.77/4.22, compression cortical/ medullar 89.47/ 3.58 |
von Mises implant 86.61; von Mises abutment 33.96; tensile cortical/ medullar 27.90/ 4.2, compression cortical/ medullar 86.57/3.6 |
|
Tension peaks in the different structures with oblique load direction (30 deg) in relation to the long axis of the tooth with 100 N in magnitude, MPa |
von Mises implant 171.42; von Mises abutment 84.82; tensile cortical/ medullar 22.02/ 2.65, compression cortical/ medullar 146.26/ 3.95 |
von Mises implant 172.02; von Mises abutment 69.96; tensile cortical / medullar 21.85 / 2.65, compression cortical/ medullar 146.04 / 3.96 |
von Mises implant 188.95; von Mises abutment 84.17; tensile cortical/ medullar 58.82/ 4.90, compression cortical/ medullar 177.81/ 6.42 |
von Mises implant 189.72; von Mises abutment 69.41; tensile cortical/ medullar 57.53/ 4.89, compression cortical/ medullar 177.58/ 6.44 |
|
|
|
N.R. indicated nor reported
Serial posts: