Table 3. Mean values of bone-related and implant-related bone level (BL) (Koch et al) and the mean insertion depths
Table 3. Mean values of bone-related and implant-related bone level
author: Andreas Schwitalla, DDS Wolf-Dieter Mller, PhD | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 3. Mean values of bone-related and implant-related bone level (BL) (Koch et al) and the mean insertion depths
| Mean bone-related BL, mm | Mean implant-related BL, mm | Mean insertion depth, mm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonsubmerged | |||
| Zirconia | -0.53 | -1.62 | -2.15 |
| Coated zirconia | -0.59 | -1.97 | -2.56 |
| Titanium | -0.37 | -1.65 | -2.02 |
| PEEK | -1.3 | -0.44 | -1.74 |
| Submerged | |||
| Zirconia | -0.76 | -1.86 | -2.62 |
| Coated zirconia | 0 | -2.25 | -2.25 |
| Titanium | -0.59 | -2.03 | -2.62 |
| PEEK | -0.58 | -1.97 | -2.55 |
*Distance from the crestal BL to the uppermost implant thread, calculated by the authors of the current review by adding bone-related BL and implant-related BL
Serial posts:
- Abstract: PEEK Dental Implants
- Introduction: PEEK Dental Implants
- Material & methods: PEEK Dental Implants
- Result: PEEK Dental Implants
- Table 1: Overview of an in vitro 3-dimensional finite element study
- Table 2. Overview of 2 in vivo animal investigations
- Discussion: PEEK Dental Implants
- Table 3. Mean values of bone-related and implant-related bone level
- Table 4. Differences in the mean insertion depths
- Conclusion: PEEK Dental Implants