Table 4. Differences in the mean insertion depths between submerged and nonsubmerged implants from Table 3
Table 4. Differences in the mean insertion depths
author: Andreas Schwitalla, DDS Wolf-Dieter Mller, PhD | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 4. Differences in the mean insertion depths between submerged and nonsubmerged implants from Table 3
| Nonsubmerged implants, mean insertion depths from Table 3, mm | Submerged implants, mean insertion depths from Table 3, mm | Differences in the Mean Insertion Depths, mm* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zirconia | -2.15 | -2.62 | +0.47 |
| Coated zirconia | -2.56 | -2.25 | -0.31 |
| Titanium | -2.02 | -2.62 | +0.6 |
| PEEK | -1.74 | -2.55 | +0.81 |
*Values calculated by authors of this review by subtracting the values of the submerged implants from the values of the nonsubmerged implants
Serial posts:
- Abstract: PEEK Dental Implants
- Introduction: PEEK Dental Implants
- Material & methods: PEEK Dental Implants
- Result: PEEK Dental Implants
- Table 1: Overview of an in vitro 3-dimensional finite element study
- Table 2. Overview of 2 in vivo animal investigations
- Discussion: PEEK Dental Implants
- Table 3. Mean values of bone-related and implant-related bone level
- Table 4. Differences in the mean insertion depths
- Conclusion: PEEK Dental Implants