Table 1. Patient and implant distribution among groups
Table 1. Patient and implant distribution among groups
author: Andrea Pandolfi,Francesca Rinaldo,Debora Pasqualotto, Fabiola Sorrentino,Giuseppe La Torre,Fabrizio Guerra | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Total | Patients | Implants | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical condition | Men | Women | n | % | Rehab. solution | n | % | n | % |
Totally edentulous | 40 | 50 | 90 | 19 | Fixed full‐arch bridge | 32 | 6.74 | 348 | 17.48 |
Implant‐supported overdenture | 58 | 12.21 | 211 | 10.60 | |||||
Partially edentulous | 73 | 82 | 155 | 33 | Fixed partial denture | 155 | 32.63 | 732 | 36.77 |
Mono‐edentulous | 110 | 120 | 230 | 48 | Single‐tooth replacement | 230 | 48.42 | 700 | 35.16 |
Total | 223 | 252 | 475 | Total | 475 | 1,991 |
Serial posts:
- A retrospective cohort study on peri‐implant complications in implants
- Introduction : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants
- Materials & methods : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (1)
- Materials & methods : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (2)
- Materials & methods : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (3)
- Materials & methods : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (4)
- Materials & methods : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (5)
- Results : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants
- Discussion : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (1)
- Discussion : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (2)
- Discussion : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants (3)
- Conclusion : A study on peri‐implant complications in implants
- Table 1. Patient and implant distribution among groups
- Table 2. Baseline information (1,991 implants)
- Table 3. Life table analysis and cumulative survival and success rate
- Table 4. Survival and success rate at implant and patient level
- Figure 1. Peri‐implantitis over the study period of 10 years at patient and implant level
- Table 5. Differences between 5 years and 10 years of function