Table 1 Patient selection criteria
Table 1 Patient selection criteria
author: David E Simmons,Pooja Maney,Austin G Teitelbaum,Susan Billiot,Lomesh J Popat,A Archontia Palaiologou | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Inclusion
Male or female
At least 18 years old
Healthy enough to undergo routine implant surgery and subsequent dental treatment
Partially edentulous requiring single dental implants in the maxilla
Adequate volume of native or grafted bone to accommodate dental implants at least 8 mm long
No active infections
Physically, emotionally, and financially able to undergo planned implant procedures
Adequate compliance to meet study requirements and necessary appointments
Exclusion
Medical need for antibiotic premedication for infective endocarditis, artificial joints, or any other medication
Uncontrolled hypertension
Uncontrolled diabetes
Serological human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive
History of significant heart, stomach, liver, kidney, blood, immune system, or other organ impairment or systemic disease that would prevent undergoing the proposed treatment
Smoke cigarettes or other tobacco products
Use of investigational drugs during the previous month
Unresolved dental conditions likely to require exiting the study for treatment, such as deep cavities, abscesses, or moderate to severe periodontal disease
History of radiation therapy to the head and neck
Unwilling or inability to sign the informed consent form
Failure to demonstrate willingness to return for a required number of visits
Need immediate dental implant placement following tooth extraction
Serial posts:
-
Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
-
Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (1)
-
Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (2)
-
Methods : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
-
Results : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
-
Discussion : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
-
Figure 1. Implant design
-
Table 1 Patient selection criteria
-
Figure 2. ISQ values at placement, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year
-
Figure 3. Mean bone loss at 6 months and 1 year
-
Table 2 Outcome success criteria
| Inclusion | Male or female |
| At least 18 years old | |
| Healthy enough to undergo routine implant surgery and subsequent dental treatment | |
| Partially edentulous requiring single dental implants in the maxilla | |
| Adequate volume of native or grafted bone to accommodate dental implants at least 8 mm long | |
| No active infections | |
| Physically, emotionally, and financially able to undergo planned implant procedures | |
| Adequate compliance to meet study requirements and necessary appointments | |
| Exclusion | Medical need for antibiotic premedication for infective endocarditis, artificial joints, or any other medication |
| Uncontrolled hypertension | |
| Uncontrolled diabetes | |
| Serological human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive | |
| History of significant heart, stomach, liver, kidney, blood, immune system, or other organ impairment or systemic disease that would prevent undergoing the proposed treatment | |
| Smoke cigarettes or other tobacco products | |
| Use of investigational drugs during the previous month | |
| Unresolved dental conditions likely to require exiting the study for treatment, such as deep cavities, abscesses, or moderate to severe periodontal disease | |
| History of radiation therapy to the head and neck | |
| Unwilling or inability to sign the informed consent form | |
| Failure to demonstrate willingness to return for a required number of visits | |
| Need immediate dental implant placement following tooth extraction |
- Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (1)
- Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (2)
- Methods : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Results : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Discussion : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Figure 1. Implant design
- Table 1 Patient selection criteria
- Figure 2. ISQ values at placement, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year
- Figure 3. Mean bone loss at 6 months and 1 year
- Table 2 Outcome success criteria