Table 1 Patient selection criteria
Table 1 Patient selection criteria
author: David E Simmons,Pooja Maney,Austin G Teitelbaum,Susan Billiot,Lomesh J Popat,A Archontia Palaiologou | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Inclusion | Male or female |
| At least 18 years old | |
| Healthy enough to undergo routine implant surgery and subsequent dental treatment | |
| Partially edentulous requiring single dental implants in the maxilla | |
| Adequate volume of native or grafted bone to accommodate dental implants at least 8 mm long | |
| No active infections | |
| Physically, emotionally, and financially able to undergo planned implant procedures | |
| Adequate compliance to meet study requirements and necessary appointments | |
| Exclusion | Medical need for antibiotic premedication for infective endocarditis, artificial joints, or any other medication |
| Uncontrolled hypertension | |
| Uncontrolled diabetes | |
| Serological human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive | |
| History of significant heart, stomach, liver, kidney, blood, immune system, or other organ impairment or systemic disease that would prevent undergoing the proposed treatment | |
| Smoke cigarettes or other tobacco products | |
| Use of investigational drugs during the previous month | |
| Unresolved dental conditions likely to require exiting the study for treatment, such as deep cavities, abscesses, or moderate to severe periodontal disease | |
| History of radiation therapy to the head and neck | |
| Unwilling or inability to sign the informed consent form | |
| Failure to demonstrate willingness to return for a required number of visits | |
| Need immediate dental implant placement following tooth extraction |
Serial posts:
- Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (1)
- Background : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study (2)
- Methods : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Results : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Discussion : Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study
- Figure 1. Implant design
- Table 1 Patient selection criteria
- Figure 2. ISQ values at placement, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year
- Figure 3. Mean bone loss at 6 months and 1 year
- Table 2 Outcome success criteria