Table 1 Study characteristics and individual results included studies : Effect of dental implant surface roughness in patients with a history of periodontal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

author: Anton Dank, Irene H A Aartman, Danil Wismeijer, Ali Tahmaseb | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Study (first author and year of publication)
	Design	General health	Perio health	Perio status	Perio diagnosis	Smoking status	Smokers (%)	Perio recall x/year	Follow-up (months)	Follow-up range	No. of patients	Mean age	Dental status	Implants surface	No. of implants
Aglietta, 2010	Retro	Yes	Yes	PHPHPCPC	Chronic	SSSS	100	Regular	120	ND	10 10 10 10	51.2 51.5 51.3 51.7	Partial	MSRSMSRS	10 10 10 10
Sayardoust, 2013	Retro	Yes	Yes	PCPCPCPC	Advanced	NSNSSSSS	50	Regular	60	ND	20 20 20 20	59.8 63.2 54.2 53.5	Partial and full	MSRSMSRS	66 52 78 56
Wennström, 2004	Pros	Yes	Yes	PCPC	Moderate-to-advanced chronic	S and NS	33	2–3/years	60	ND	51	59.5	Partial	MSRS	67 70
Matarasso, 2010	Retro	Yes	Yes	PCPCPHPH	Chronic	NSNSNSNS	O	Regular	120	ND	20 20 20 20	47.2 46.5 47.5 48.1	Partial	MSRSMSRS	20 20 20 20
Nicu, 2012	Pros	Yes	Yes	PCPC	Moderate to severe chronic	S and NS	44	Regular	36	ND	1818	55.4 55.4	Partial and full	MSRS	39 39
Gallego, 2018	Retro	5.3% controlled diabetes	Yes	PCPCPC	Mild to Advanced	S and NS	28	3–4/years	36	ND	27 74 167	61. 0 61.2 61.1	Partial	MSHSRS	72 14 55 38
	Site of placement1. Max and/or mand2. Ant and/or post	Stage	AB	Early implant loss (%)	Late implant loss (%)	Implant survival (%)	Implant mean marginal bone loss	Implant mean marginal bone loss range	Implant mean attach level loss	Implant mean attachment level Loss range	BoP (%)	Peri-implantitis (%)	Type of prosthesis	Screw-retained or Cemented	Implant surface
Aglietta, 2010	1. Max and mand2. Ant and post	2121	NR	0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0	90.0 100 90.0 80.0	2.65 2.51 3.47 3.77	0.31 0.31 1.09 1.43	ND	ND	18.1 20.1 19.3 18.7	ND	Single unit	NR	Turned, TPS surface
Sayardoust, 2013	1. Max and mand2. NR	2	No	2.5 3.1 12.1 3.0	0.6 0.8 3.0 0.8	96.9 96.1 84.9 96.2	0.84 1.26 1.54 1.16	0.14 0.15 0.21 0.15	ND	ND	< 15%	ND	Single unit, FPD	Screw	Turned, oxidized surface
Wennström, 2004	1. Max and mand2. Ant and post	2	Yes	1.45 0.0	1.45 9.3	97.1 98.6	0.33 0.48	1.07 0.95	ND	ND	5.0	4.7	FPD, extension FPS’s	Screw	Turned, TiO2-blasted surface
Matarasso, 2010	1. Max and mand2. Ant and post	2121	NR	0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0	5.0 15.0 5.0 5.0	95.0 85.0 95.0 95.0	2.78 2.32 1.95 1.43	0.48 0.41 0.42 0.38	ND	ND	ND	ND	Single unit	NR	Turned, TPS
Nicu, 2012	1. Max and mand2. Ant and post	2	Yes	4.2 0.0	0.0 0.0	95.8 100	0.98 1.02	0.63 0.72	3.44.0	1.41.9	59 69	ND	FPD, overdenture	Screw	Turned, TiUnite
Gallego, 2018	1. Mand2. Post	1	Yes	0.0 0.0 0.0	0.0 0.0 0.0	100 100 100	0.96 0.77 1.48	0.49 0. 60 1.09	ND	ND	9.6 13.5 13.0	ND	FPD	Screw	Turned, osseotite, TiUnite

Table 1 Study characteristics and individual results included studies

Serial posts: