Table 3 Quantitative analysis of CFU counts (× 10^5) from rough and machined surface implants after cleansing by each method
Table 3 Quantitative analysis of CFU counts
author: Motohiro Otsuki, Masahiro Wada, Masaya Yamaguchi, Shigetada Kawabata, Yoshinobu Maeda Kazunori Ikebe | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 3 Quantitative analysis of CFU counts (× 105) from rough and machined surface implants after cleansing by each method
| Rough surface | Cont | G | US | Air | Rot | Las |
| Median | 137.5 | 3.4 | 46.5 | 13.0 | 4.8 | 16.3 |
| Min | 73.0 | 0.3 | 6.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| Max | 785.0 | 27.0 | 240.0 | 35.5 | 37.0 | 34.0 |
| Machine surface | Cont | G | US | Air | Rot | Las |
| Median | 84.5 | 0.9 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 25.3 |
| Min | 43.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Max | 295.0 | 4.2 | 36.0 | 14.0 | 5.6 | 61.5 |
Serial posts:
- Evaluation of decontamination methods of oral biofilms formed on screw-shaped, rough and machined surface implants: an ex vivo study
- Background : Evaluation of decontamination methods of oral biofilms formed on screw-shaped, rough and machined surface implants
- Materials & methods : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (1)
- Materials & methods : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (2)
- Materials & methods : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (3)
- Results : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (3)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (1)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (2)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (3)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (4)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (5)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (6)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (7)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (8)
- Discussion : Evaluation of decontamination methods on implants (9)
- Figure 1. Hard resin splint model carrying 6 implants
- Figure 2. GC Aadva® implant; 3.3-mm diameter, 8-mm length
- Figure 3. Decontamination methods
- Figure 4. SEM analysis of 4 areas. 1 Rough surface—microthread area
- Figure 5. Quantitative analysis of CFU counts on implants
- Figure 6. Comparison of cleansability of each decontamination method
- Table 1 Qualitative evaluation by SEM analysis of micro- and macrothread areas of rough surface implants
- Table 2 Qualitative evaluation by SEM analysis of micro- and macrothread areas of machined surface implants
- Table 3 Quantitative analysis of CFU counts