Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup

Fig. 4. Vestibular view of contralateral lateral i...

Fig. 4. Vestibular view of contralateral lateral incisor Fig. 4. Vestibular view of contralateral lateral incisor

Fig. 3. Vestibular view of right lateral implant s...

Fig. 3. Vestibular view of right lateral implant supported crown Fig. 3. Vestibular view of right lateral implant supported crown

Fig. 2. Probing of the peri-implant sulcus : Esthe...

Fig. 2. Probing of the peri-implant sulcus Fig. 2. Probing of the peri-implant sulcus

Fig. 1. a Pre-operative panoramic radiograph of th...

Fig. 1. a Pre-operative panoramic radiograph of the patient, (b) abutment in place, following the osseointegration period, (c) periapical radiograph at 1-year follow up, (d) final restoration at 1-year follow up, and (e) smile line Fig. 1. a Pre-operative panoramic radiograph of the patient, (b) abutment in place, following the osseointegration period, (c) periapical radiograph at 1-year foll...

Table 6 Spearman’s correlation test between smil...

  Smile line VAS Smile line Correlation coefficient 1 − .699a ...

Table 5 PES of patients with different smile lines...

PES result Smile line Low (n = 4) Medium (n = 10) High (n = 5) Poor (0–...

Table 4 Spearman’s correlation test between VAS ...

  PES WES VAS Spearman’s rho VAS Correlation coefficient ...

Table 3 Detailed results of pink and white estheti...

  Esthetic score 0 1 2 PES  Mesial papilla ...

Table 2 Esthetic scores, sub-classification of the...

  Number of patients Percentage Pink esthetic score  Poor (0–7) 2 10.5% ...

Table 1 Clinical features of the implants (Of: Est...

Implant site Biotype Smile line Placement timing PES WES ...

About this article : Esthetic evaluation of implan...

Altay, M.A., Sindel, A., Tezerişener, H.A. et al. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes. Int J Implant Dent 5, 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3 Download citation Received: 25 July 2018 Accepted: 09 December 2018 Published: 07 January 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0...

Rights and permissions : Esthetic evaluation of im...

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were m...

Ethics declarations : Esthetic evaluation of impla...

This study was approved by the Akdeniz University Ethical Review Board. All participants consented to publish their information details. Dr. Altay has provided consultancy for Checkpoint Surgical LLC in 2014. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information : Esthetic evaluation of implan...

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Dumlupinar Boulevard, Campus, 07058, Antalya, Turkey Mehmet Ali Altay, Alper Sindel, Hüseyin Alican Tezerişener & Nelli Yıldırımyan Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey Mehmet Mustafa Özarslan You can also search for this author in ...

Acknowledgements : Esthetic evaluation of implant-...

Not applicable. This study was conducted without external funding. All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Jivraj S, Chee W. Treatment planning of implants in the aesthetic zone. British Dental J. 2006;201(2):77–89. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:43–61. Huynh-Ba G, Meister DJ, Hoders AB, Mealey BL, Mills MP, Oates TW, Cochran DL, Prihoda TJ, McMahan C...

References : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Hof M, Umar N, Budas N, Seemann R, Pommer B, Zechner W. Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective indices-comparative analysis of reliability and validity. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):697–706. Li X, Wu B, Cheng X, Li Y, Xie X, Deng F. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: the implant restoration esthetic index and patient perception. J Prosthodont. 2017. htt...

References : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Rokn A, Bassir S, Ghahroudi AR, Kharazifard M, Manesheof R. Long-term stability of soft tissue esthetic outcomes following conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 10-12 year results. Open Dent. 2016;10:602. Angkaew C, Serichetaphongse P, Krisdapong S, Dart MM, Pimkhaokham A. Oral health-related quality of life and esthetic outcome in single anterior maxillary implants. Clin...

Abbreviations : Esthetic evaluation of implant-sup...

Pink esthetic score Standard deviation Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Visual analogue scale White esthetic score

Conclusions : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppo...

Professionally reported esthetic outcomes (PES and WES results) may not significantly correlate with patient-reported outcomes, although they are helpful in monitorization of implants in the anterior zone during follow-ups. This study reveals that smile line is a significant factor in patient satisfaction, which should be evaluated thoroughly prior to implant placement in the anterior maxilla.

Discussion : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Only a limited number of studies compared esthetic outcomes of implants placed using different protocols [3, 25, 26]. A majority of these studies compared the results of immediate implant placement (type 1) with other protocols. Huynh-Ba et al. found no difference in terms of esthetics between type 1 and type 2 implant placement [25]. Similarly, Boardman et al. observed higher PES results followin...

Discussion : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

In the present study, only two implants in patients with thin gingival biotypes failed to reach the clinically acceptable PES level. All other patients with both thick and thin biotypes achieved either acceptable or almost perfect scores for both PES and WES. According to the results of Angkaew et al., the PES/WES scores of patients with thick gingival biotype were significantly higher than those ...

Discussion : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Ever since the introduction of dental implants in the 1960s, they have been used worldwide with high success rates and accepted predictability [13]. Initial efforts of implant treatment mainly focused on osseointegration and function, whereas today, esthetics is also regarded as an essential component, which is commonly addressed together with functional goals of rehabilitation with dental implant...

Results : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported...

All implants were loaded 3–6 months after implant surgery (conventional loading protocol); therefore, this parameter was not analyzed in this study. The overall effect of gingival biotype and smile line on PES, WES, or VAS was studied using a general linear regression analysis for multivariate tests. Although both PES and WES were not affected (p = 0.580, p = 303; respectively), VAS wa...

Results : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported...

Question4. “How do you feel about the color of the gum that is around your new implant tooth?” Mean patient rating was calculated as 8.4 (range 2–10, SD ± 2.0). Median score was 9. Fifteen patients responded with a score of ≥ 8 and 17 patients responded with a score of ≥ 6. Question5. “What is your overall satisfaction with the new implant tooth?” Mean patient rating was ca...

Results : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported...

A total of 19 (7 female and 12 male) patients, who were rehabilitated with a single implant in the anterior maxilla, were included in this study. Patients’ ages ranged between 19 and 42 with a mean of 31.8 years. None of the implants were associated with increased probing depth, bleeding, suppuration, foreign body sensation, pain, morbidity, or infection. Clinical features related to anterior s...

Methods : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported...

All patients were assessed according to the White Esthetic Score [8] which comprised the evaluation of five variables including general tooth form, tooth contour, tooth color (hue and value), surface texture, and translucence. Each variable was given a score of 0, 1, or 2. A score of 0 indicated the worst and a score of 2 indicated the best result for each variable. The implant-supported tooth was...

Methods : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported...

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki on medical protocol and was approved by the Akdeniz University Ethical Review Board. The patients rehabilitated with a single implant-supported fixed prosthesis in the maxillary esthetic zone at the departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Prosthetic Dentistry of Akdeniz University between June 2015 and April 2017 we...

Background : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Patient satisfaction, which indicates the success of the implant treatment from the patient’s perspective, is another important outcome measure and is commonly performed with questionnaires or a visual analog scale (VAS) [2, 8]. A current review of the literature, however, reveals only a limited number of studies reporting on patient-centered outcomes in addition to objective evaluations of impl...

Background : Esthetic evaluation of implant-suppor...

Rehabilitation of missing teeth in the anterior maxilla with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis is a widely accepted treatment modality [1]. Dental implants have high rates of predictability in terms of osseointegration, particularly due to improvements in treatment techniques and surface topography [2]. However, rehabilitation with dental implants is not yet considered a perfect treatment moda...

Abstract : Esthetic evaluation of implant-supporte...

This study investigated objective and patient-reported esthetic outcomes and their correlation for single-tooth implant restorations in the maxillary anterior region. Nineteen patients were included. Gingival biotypes and smile lines were evaluated. Esthetic evaluation was performed according to the pink and white esthetic scores (PES and WES). Patients rated their satisfaction regarding the impl...