Dental implants, Implant-supported prosthesis, Long-term survival, Titanium plasma-sprayed surface
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
author: Tadashi Horikawa, Tetsurou Odatsu, Takatoshi Itoh, Yoshiki Soejima, Hutoshi Morinaga, Naruyoshi Abe, Naoyuki Tsuchiya, Toshikazu | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Background : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Methods : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- About this article : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 2 Distribution of implants in situ (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 3 Distribution of implants by diameter and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 4 Distribution of implants by length and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 6 Cox regression analyses for cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 7 Cox regression analyses for cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis by a gender (p = 0.0221), b implant type (p = 0.0128), c implant position (p = 0.2470), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.2488), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.0045). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 6. Cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses by a gender (p = 0.1220) and b type of prostheses (p < 0.0001). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant