Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
author: Tadashi Horikawa, Tetsurou Odatsu, Takatoshi Itoh, Yoshiki Soejima, Hutoshi Morinaga, Naruyoshi Abe, Naoyuki Tsuchiya, Toshikazu | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Hazard ratio
95% confidence interval
p value
Gender (male)
1.99
0.538~8.201
0.3018
Implant type (TPS)
2.86
0.579~13.626
0.1897
Implant position (maxilla to mandibular/anterior)
40.09
4.062~994.751
0.0012
Implant position (maxilla to mandibular/posterior)
18.69
3.127~155.409
0.0013
Implant position (mandibular/anterior to mandibular/posterior)
0.47
0.022~3.912
0.5024
Additional soft tissue management (yes)
1.64
0.290~12.695
0.5808
Width of keratinized mucosa (> 2 mm)
0.78
0.166~3.294
0.7365
Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Background : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Methods : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
-
Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
-
Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
About this article : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 2 Distribution of implants in situ (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 3 Distribution of implants by diameter and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 4 Distribution of implants by length and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 6 Cox regression analyses for cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 7 Cox regression analyses for cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis by a gender (p = 0.0221), b implant type (p = 0.0128), c implant position (p = 0.2470), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.2488), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.0045). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 6. Cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses by a gender (p = 0.1220) and b type of prostheses (p < 0.0001). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
| Hazard ratio | 95% confidence interval | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 1.99 | 0.538~8.201 | 0.3018 |
| Implant type (TPS) | 2.86 | 0.579~13.626 | 0.1897 |
| Implant position (maxilla to mandibular/anterior) | 40.09 | 4.062~994.751 | 0.0012 |
| Implant position (maxilla to mandibular/posterior) | 18.69 | 3.127~155.409 | 0.0013 |
| Implant position (mandibular/anterior to mandibular/posterior) | 0.47 | 0.022~3.912 | 0.5024 |
| Additional soft tissue management (yes) | 1.64 | 0.290~12.695 | 0.5808 |
| Width of keratinized mucosa (> 2 mm) | 0.78 | 0.166~3.294 | 0.7365 |
Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival
- Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Background : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Methods : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- About this article : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 2 Distribution of implants in situ (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 3 Distribution of implants by diameter and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 4 Distribution of implants by length and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 6 Cox regression analyses for cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 7 Cox regression analyses for cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis by a gender (p = 0.0221), b implant type (p = 0.0128), c implant position (p = 0.2470), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.2488), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.0045). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 6. Cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses by a gender (p = 0.1220) and b type of prostheses (p < 0.0001). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant