Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
author: Tadashi Horikawa, Tetsurou Odatsu, Takatoshi Itoh, Yoshiki Soejima, Hutoshi Morinaga, Naruyoshi Abe, Naoyuki Tsuchiya, Toshikazu | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Age/gender
Male
Female
Total
20–29
3
1
4
30–39
2
7
9
40–49
8
14
22
50–59
8
18
26
60–69
15
13
28
70–79
2
1
3
Total
38
54
92
Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92)
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Background : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Methods : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
-
Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
-
Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
-
References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
-
Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
-
Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
-
Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
About this article : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 2 Distribution of implants in situ (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 3 Distribution of implants by diameter and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 4 Distribution of implants by length and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 6 Cox regression analyses for cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Table 7 Cox regression analyses for cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
-
Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis by a gender (p = 0.0221), b implant type (p = 0.0128), c implant position (p = 0.2470), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.2488), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.0045). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
-
Fig. 6. Cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses by a gender (p = 0.1220) and b type of prostheses (p < 0.0001). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
| Age/gender | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20–29 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 30–39 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| 40–49 | 8 | 14 | 22 |
| 50–59 | 8 | 18 | 26 |
| 60–69 | 15 | 13 | 28 |
| 70–79 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 38 | 54 | 92 |
Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92)
- Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Background : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Methods : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [3]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [4]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [1]
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function [2]
- Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- About this article : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 1 Age and gender distributions (n = 92) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 2 Distribution of implants in situ (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 3 Distribution of implants by diameter and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 4 Distribution of implants by length and location (n = 223) : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 5 Cox regression analyses for implant survival : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 6 Cox regression analyses for cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Table 7 Cox regression analyses for cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implants with at least 25 years’ function
- Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rates by a gender (p = 0.1049), b implant type (p = 0.6259), c implant position (p < 0.0001), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.1149), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.7132). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 3. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 4. Cumulative incidence of peri-implantitis by a gender (p = 0.0221), b implant type (p = 0.0128), c implant position (p = 0.2470), d presence of additional soft tissue management (p = 0.2488), and e width of keratinized mucosa around implant (p = 0.0045). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses at 10, 15, and 25 years after the prosthesis setting : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant
- Fig. 6. Cumulative survival rate of complication-free prostheses by a gender (p = 0.1220) and b type of prostheses (p < 0.0001). Log rank test was used for assessing statistical significance : Retrospective cohort study of rough-surface titanium implant