Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
2.2 Surgical and prosthetic procedures
To be included in the study, participants had to have an edentulous space during at least 4 months, spanning 2–3 teeth in the posterior maxilla or mandible and presence of natural teeth, partial prosthesis and/or implants in the opposite jaw in contact with the planned bridge. Patients also had to be able to receive an 11 mm long and 4 mm wide dental implant. Furthermore, each patient had to sign an informed consent. Randomization was done at the time of surgery by opening a sealed envelope containing information if 6‐mm implants or 11‐mm implants would be used.
Implant surgery was performed under local anesthesia by a single surgeon at each center. Pre‐operatively patients were given 2 g of amoxicillin or 600 mg of clindamycin. Post‐operatively, the patients were instructed to rinse with chlorhexidine solution twice a day for 10 days. The implants were used with corresponding components and were installed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Implant placement was performed following a one‐stage surgical procedure. Corresponding healing abutments were placed and torqued to 15 Ncm. Six weeks after surgery an acrylic screw‐retained provisional restoration was placed in occlusion. A definitive screw‐retained fixed partial prosthesis (porcelain fused to metal) was installed on abutments (Uni‐Abutment or Angled Abutment) 6 months following the installation of the provisional restoration and was torqued to 15 Ncm.
Serial posts:
- Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
- Table 1. Baseline characteristics
- Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
- Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
- Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants