Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 6‐mm group (49 participants with 108 implants) and the 11‐mm group (46 participants with 101 implants)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics
author: Felix L Gulj,Henny J A Meijer,Ingemar Abrahamsson,Christopher A Barwacz,Stephen Chen,Paul J Palmer,Homayoun Zadeh,Clark M Stanfo | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 6‐mm group (49 participants with 108 implants) and the 11‐mm group (46 participants with 101 implants)
Group 6‐mm
Group 11‐mm
Mean age in years
55 ± 9, range 26–69
54 ± 10, range 34–70
Gender (number male/female)
21/28
27/19
Received a 2‐implant restoration
39
37
Received a 3‐implant restoration
10
9
Serial posts:
-
Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
-
Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
-
Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
-
Table 1. Baseline characteristics
-
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
-
Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
-
Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
-
CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the 6‐mm group (49 participants with 108 implants) and the 11‐mm group (46 participants with 101 implants)
| Group 6‐mm | Group 11‐mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean age in years | 55 ± 9, range 26–69 | 54 ± 10, range 34–70 |
| Gender (number male/female) | 21/28 | 27/19 |
| Received a 2‐implant restoration | 39 | 37 |
| Received a 3‐implant restoration | 10 | 9 |
- Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
- Table 1. Baseline characteristics
- Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
- Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
- Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants