Table 3. Clinical measures of implants with plaque (in percentages), implants with bleeding on probing (in percentages) and mean (±SD) probing depth at implant level (in mm) at T0 (placement and loading of provisional restoration) and at T60 (5‐year follow‐up after loading of provisional restoration), and p‐value of differences between the groups at both evaluation periods
Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
author: Felix L Gulj,Henny J A Meijer,Ingemar Abrahamsson,Christopher A Barwacz,Stephen Chen,Paul J Palmer,Homayoun Zadeh,Clark M Stanfo | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 3. Clinical measures of implants with plaque (in percentages), implants with bleeding on probing (in percentages) and mean (±SD) probing depth at implant level (in mm) at T0 (placement and loading of provisional restoration) and at T60 (5‐year follow‐up after loading of provisional restoration), and p‐value of differences between the groups at both evaluation periods
| Baseline (6 weeks after implant installation) | 5‐year follow‐up | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6‐mm group (n = 102) |
11‐mm group (n = 101) |
p‐value |
6‐mm group (n = 98) |
11‐mm group (n = 86) |
p‐value | |
| Implants with plaque | 12.6% | 20.4% | .177 | 16.3% | 7.0% | .068 |
| Implants with bleeding | 15.8% | 25.5% | .111 | 43.9% | 32.6% | .131 |
| Mean probing depth ± SD in mm | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | .281 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | .298 |
Serial posts:
- Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
- Table 1. Baseline characteristics
- Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
- Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
- Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants