Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution in (number and percentages) of marginal bone change between loading and 5 years in function
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
author: Felix L Gulj,Henny J A Meijer,Ingemar Abrahamsson,Christopher A Barwacz,Stephen Chen,Paul J Palmer,Homayoun Zadeh,Clark M Stanfo | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution in (number and percentages) of marginal bone change between loading and 5 years in function
6‐mm group (n = 94)
11‐mm group (n = 80)
mean bone change (SD)
+0.01 (0.45)
−0.12 (0.93)
bone loss>−2.0 down
1 (1.1%)
6 (7.5%)
bone loss>−2.0 up to and including −1.5
1 (1.1%)
1 (1.2%)
bone loss ˃−1.5 up to and including −1.0
1 (1.1%)
0 (0%)
bone loss ˃−1.0 up to and including −0.5
8 (8.5%)
3 (3.8%)
bone loss ˃−0.5 up to and including 0.0
47 (50.0%)
33 (41.2%)
bone gain ˃0.0 up to and including 0.5
27 (28.6%)
28 (35.0%)
bone gain > 0.5 up to and including 1.0
5 (5.3%)
6 (7.5%)
bone gain > 1.0 up to and including 1.5
3 (3.2%)
3 (3.8%)
bone gain > 1.5 up to and including 2.0
1 (1.1%)
0 (0%)
bone gain > 2.0 up
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Serial posts:
-
Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
-
Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
-
Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
-
Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
-
Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
-
Table 1. Baseline characteristics
-
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
-
Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
-
Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
-
DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
-
CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution in (number and percentages) of marginal bone change between loading and 5 years in function
| 6‐mm group (n = 94) | 11‐mm group (n = 80) | |
|---|---|---|
| mean bone change (SD) | +0.01 (0.45) | −0.12 (0.93) |
| bone loss>−2.0 down | 1 (1.1%) | 6 (7.5%) |
| bone loss>−2.0 up to and including −1.5 | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| bone loss ˃−1.5 up to and including −1.0 | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| bone loss ˃−1.0 up to and including −0.5 | 8 (8.5%) | 3 (3.8%) |
| bone loss ˃−0.5 up to and including 0.0 | 47 (50.0%) | 33 (41.2%) |
| bone gain ˃0.0 up to and including 0.5 | 27 (28.6%) | 28 (35.0%) |
| bone gain > 0.5 up to and including 1.0 | 5 (5.3%) | 6 (7.5%) |
| bone gain > 1.0 up to and including 1.5 | 3 (3.2%) | 3 (3.8%) |
| bone gain > 1.5 up to and including 2.0 | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| bone gain > 2.0 up | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
- Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
- Table 1. Baseline characteristics
- Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
- Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
- Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants