Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution in (number and percentages) of marginal bone change between loading and 5 years in function
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
author: Felix L Gulj,Henny J A Meijer,Ingemar Abrahamsson,Christopher A Barwacz,Stephen Chen,Paul J Palmer,Homayoun Zadeh,Clark M Stanfo | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution in (number and percentages) of marginal bone change between loading and 5 years in function
| 6‐mm group (n = 94) | 11‐mm group (n = 80) | |
|---|---|---|
| mean bone change (SD) | +0.01 (0.45) | −0.12 (0.93) |
| bone loss>−2.0 down | 1 (1.1%) | 6 (7.5%) |
| bone loss>−2.0 up to and including −1.5 | 1 (1.1%) | 1 (1.2%) |
| bone loss ˃−1.5 up to and including −1.0 | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| bone loss ˃−1.0 up to and including −0.5 | 8 (8.5%) | 3 (3.8%) |
| bone loss ˃−0.5 up to and including 0.0 | 47 (50.0%) | 33 (41.2%) |
| bone gain ˃0.0 up to and including 0.5 | 27 (28.6%) | 28 (35.0%) |
| bone gain > 0.5 up to and including 1.0 | 5 (5.3%) | 6 (7.5%) |
| bone gain > 1.0 up to and including 1.5 | 3 (3.2%) | 3 (3.8%) |
| bone gain > 1.5 up to and including 2.0 | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0%) |
| bone gain > 2.0 up | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Serial posts:
- Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants in the posterior region
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- Figure 1: patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1a: Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 1b. Five‐year follow‐up clinical photograph of patient with two 6‐mm implants
- Figure 2. Five‐year follow‐up of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2a. Five‐year follow‐up radiograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Figure 2b. Five‐year follow‐up photograph of patient with two 11‐mm implants
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- Material & methods : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- Results : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants
- Table 1. Baseline characteristics
- Table 2. Mean value (in mm), standard deviation (SD), and frequency distribution
- Table 3. Clinical measures of implants
- Table 4. Number of technical complications at implant level and patient level
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (1)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (2)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (3)
- DISCUSSION : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants (4)
- CONCLUSIONS : Comparison of 6‐mm and 11‐mm dental implants