Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
In the present study, 64 CBCT images (128 maxillary sinuses), taken between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013 at the Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery at the University of Zurich, were included. The inclusion criterion of each CBCT scan was the presence of two complete maxillary sinuses; the osseus borders of both sinuses had to be entirely visible.
The scans were performed using a KaVo 3D eXam CBCT (Biberach, Germany). The settings were 5.0 mA and 120 kV, with a voxel size of 0.125, 0.25, 0.3, or 0.4 mm (exposure time 26.9 s for 0.3/0.4 voxel size or 26.9 s for 0.125/0.25 voxel size). The field of view (FOV) ranged between a height of 10–13.3 cm (patient-adjusted) with a constant diameter of 16 cm.
For the measurement of the maxillary sinus volume, the CBCT images were imported as DICOM files into SMOP, an implant planning software (Swissmeda AG, Baar, Switzerland). This software allows the calculation of volumes (mm3) and surfaces (mm2) of a 3D object (e.g., maxillary sinus) by interpolating closed curves.
Using this tool, the volume of each maxillary sinus was calculated by drawing parallel-oriented closed curves in the same coronal plane. Volume measurements were performed in a standardized manner. First, the most posterior and anterior part of each maxillary sinus was defined by placing a curve each in the coronal plane. Next, the space between the two curves was divided into equally sized slices of 2 mm by placing further curves. As a result, a single sinus consisted of 15–25 curves (depending upon the size of the maxillary cavity), having an intercurve distance of 2 mm (Fig. 1).
Some CBCT scans showed sinus cavities that were radiographically partially or fully obliterated indicating a swelling of the mucosa or a sinus pathology. In order to calculate the exact volume of this obliteration, two measurements were performed: first, the sinus volume within the osseus borders was measured by placing the curves on these osseus boundaries. Second, in cases of obliteration, the curves were placed on the mucous borders within the osseus maxillary sinus, measuring the remaining pneumatized cavity. Next, subtracting the two volumes, the obliterated sinus volume was calculated (Figs. 2 and 3).
Serial posts:
- Abstract : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Background : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Conclusions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [3]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Ethics declarations : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Rights and permissions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- About this article : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 1 Mean, median minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the surface in square centimeter and volume in cubic centimeter of the osseus maxillary sinuses and the remaining pneumatized cavities in cases of obliterated sinuses as well as mean, median, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the calculated obliterated sinus volume in cubic centimeter : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 2 Frequency of pathologies in 128 maxillary sinuses : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Fig. 1. Calculation of the sinus body by interpolating 15–25 curves at a distance of 2 mm, depending upon the size of the maxillary cavity : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 2. View from the coronal plane. The marked curves define the osseus and mucous boundaries of the maxillary sinuses. The hatched surface illustrates the measured remaining pneumatized cavity of an obliterated sinus and the filled (yellow) surface highlights the calculated obliterated volume : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 3. 3D view of osseus sinus volumes. Surface area (cm2) and volume (cm3) were calculated by the software : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 4. The association between the osseus volume and the dentition. Edentulous, partly edentulous, and dentate patients showed no relevant difference in the size of the osseus sinus volume (p = 0.52) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 5. The association between the obliterated volume and sinus pathology. The presence of a pathology significantly increased the obliterated volume of a maxillary sinus (p < 0.001). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the x-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 6. No statistical significant association between a patient’s age and the presence of obliteration of at least one maxillary sinus was found (p = 0.92). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the y-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 7. The association between the mean osseus sinus volume and age. No significant association between these parameters was found (p = 0.2) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 8. The association between mean osseus sinus volume of the maxillary sinus and gender. Men have a statistically significant higher mean osseus volume than women (p = 0.007) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam