References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
Lee KC, Lee SJ. Clinical features and treatments of odontogenic sinusitis. Yonsei Med J. 2010;51(6):932–7.
Brook I. Sinusitis of odontogenic origin. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery. 2006;135(3):349–55.
Nunes CA, Guedes OA, Alencar AH, Peters OA, Estrela CR, Estrela C. Evaluation of periapical lesions and their association with maxillary sinus abnormalities on cone-beam computed tomographic images. J Endod. 2016;42(1):42–6.
Beaumont C, Zafiropoulos G-G, Rohmann K, Tatakis DN. Prevalence of maxillary sinus disease and abnormalities in patients scheduled for sinus lift procedures. J Periodontol. 2005;76(3):461–7.
Tarp B, Fiirgaard B, Christensen T, Jensen JJ, Black FT. The prevalence and significance of incidental paranasal sinus abnormalities on MRI. Rhinology. 2000;38(1):33–8.
Casamassimo PS, Lilly GE. Mucosal cysts of the maxillary sinus: a clinical and radiographic study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology. 1980;50(3):282–6.
Velasco-Torres M, Padial-Molina M, Avila-Ortiz G, Garcia-Delgado R, O'Valle F, Catena A, et al. Maxillary sinus dimensions decrease as age and tooth loss increase. Implant Dent. 2017;26(2):288–95.
Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(1):48–56.
Barak MM, Lieberman DE, Hublin JJ. A Wolff in sheep’s clothing: trabecular bone adaptation in response to changes in joint loading orientation. Bone. 2011;49(6):1141–51.
Chappard D, Basle MF, Legrand E, Audran M. Trabecular bone microarchitecture: a review. Morphologie. 2008;92(299):162–70.
Lang NP, Lindhe J. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry, vol. 2. Set: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
Hamdy RM, Abdel-Wahed N. Three-dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. J Adv Res. 2014;5(3):387–95.
Unruh AM. Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain. 1996;65(2–3):123–67.
Mohlhenrich SC, Heussen N, Peters F, Steiner T, Holzle F, Modabber A. Is the maxillary sinus really suitable in sex determination? A three-dimensional analysis of maxillary sinus volume and surface depending on sex and dentition. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2015;26(8):e723–6.
Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, Kanda S. Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology. 1994;23(3):163–8.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Background : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Conclusions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [3]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Ethics declarations : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Rights and permissions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- About this article : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 1 Mean, median minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the surface in square centimeter and volume in cubic centimeter of the osseus maxillary sinuses and the remaining pneumatized cavities in cases of obliterated sinuses as well as mean, median, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the calculated obliterated sinus volume in cubic centimeter : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 2 Frequency of pathologies in 128 maxillary sinuses : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Fig. 1. Calculation of the sinus body by interpolating 15–25 curves at a distance of 2 mm, depending upon the size of the maxillary cavity : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 2. View from the coronal plane. The marked curves define the osseus and mucous boundaries of the maxillary sinuses. The hatched surface illustrates the measured remaining pneumatized cavity of an obliterated sinus and the filled (yellow) surface highlights the calculated obliterated volume : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 3. 3D view of osseus sinus volumes. Surface area (cm2) and volume (cm3) were calculated by the software : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 4. The association between the osseus volume and the dentition. Edentulous, partly edentulous, and dentate patients showed no relevant difference in the size of the osseus sinus volume (p = 0.52) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 5. The association between the obliterated volume and sinus pathology. The presence of a pathology significantly increased the obliterated volume of a maxillary sinus (p < 0.001). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the x-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 6. No statistical significant association between a patient’s age and the presence of obliteration of at least one maxillary sinus was found (p = 0.92). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the y-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 7. The association between the mean osseus sinus volume and age. No significant association between these parameters was found (p = 0.2) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 8. The association between mean osseus sinus volume of the maxillary sinus and gender. Men have a statistically significant higher mean osseus volume than women (p = 0.007) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam