Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
Patient-specific variables like gender, date of birth, and date of CBCT were recorded. The date of the CBCT image was further divided into either being in autumn/winter (1 January 2013–19 March 2013; 22 September 2013–31 December 2013) or spring/summer (20 March 2013–21 September 2013). The maxillary sinus was classified into obliterated or nonobliterated. It was also documented if there was a unilateral or bilateral obliteration in the CBCT image. Obliterated cavities were further classified using the following radiographic findings: absence of alteration (0), mucosal thickening (1), sinus polyp (2), complete obliteration (3), mucosal thickening and periapical radiolucency (4), foreign body (5), mucosal thickening and foreign body (6), and nonspecific obliteration (7, partial obliteration, not being defined by the previous criteria). Due to the close relationship between the posterior teeth (premolars, molars) and the maxillary sinus, the teeth starting at the first premolar were recorded as either present or missing, along with the presence or absence of endodontic treatment. Additionally, the number of teeth and roots communicating with the maxillary sinus and any apical radiolucency was documented.
The data was primarily analyzed descriptively. The analysis was performed on two different datasets depending on the main question: either on a sinus level consisting of 128 maxillary sinuses or on a patient level consisting of the respective 64 patients. In cases where sinus-level information was associated with patient-level characteristics (presence of pathology vs. obliterated volume, presence of apical radiolucency vs. obliterated volume, presence of pathology vs. number of communicating roots, dentition status vs. osseus sinus volume), one sinus per patient was randomly chosen for the analysis in order to not violate assumptions of independency for the Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
For patient-level analysis, the association between a patient’s age and the presence of obliteration was analyzed using logistic regression and patient’s age vs. the mean osseus sinus volume was assessed using linear regression. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to investigate if there is an association between the mean osseus sinus volume and gender. Differences between osseus sinus volumes on the left and right side of a patient were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess possible associations between bilateral obliteration and the date of the CBCT scan (season of the year) as well as between unilateral obliteration and apical radiolucency. The significance level α was set to 0.05 for all analyses. Calculations were performed using R [3].
Serial posts:
- Abstract : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Background : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Methods : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Results : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Discussion : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Conclusions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- References : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [3]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [1]
- Author information : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography [2]
- Ethics declarations : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Rights and permissions : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- About this article : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 1 Mean, median minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the surface in square centimeter and volume in cubic centimeter of the osseus maxillary sinuses and the remaining pneumatized cavities in cases of obliterated sinuses as well as mean, median, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the calculated obliterated sinus volume in cubic centimeter : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Table 2 Frequency of pathologies in 128 maxillary sinuses : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computed tomography
- Fig. 1. Calculation of the sinus body by interpolating 15–25 curves at a distance of 2 mm, depending upon the size of the maxillary cavity : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 2. View from the coronal plane. The marked curves define the osseus and mucous boundaries of the maxillary sinuses. The hatched surface illustrates the measured remaining pneumatized cavity of an obliterated sinus and the filled (yellow) surface highlights the calculated obliterated volume : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 3. 3D view of osseus sinus volumes. Surface area (cm2) and volume (cm3) were calculated by the software : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 4. The association between the osseus volume and the dentition. Edentulous, partly edentulous, and dentate patients showed no relevant difference in the size of the osseus sinus volume (p = 0.52) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 5. The association between the obliterated volume and sinus pathology. The presence of a pathology significantly increased the obliterated volume of a maxillary sinus (p < 0.001). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the x-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 6. No statistical significant association between a patient’s age and the presence of obliteration of at least one maxillary sinus was found (p = 0.92). For better visibility, the diagram has been jittered along the y-axis : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 7. The association between the mean osseus sinus volume and age. No significant association between these parameters was found (p = 0.2) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam
- Fig. 8. The association between mean osseus sinus volume of the maxillary sinus and gender. Men have a statistically significant higher mean osseus volume than women (p = 0.007) : 3D-evaluation of the maxillary sinus in cone-beam