Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Analysis of results from Occluzer and BiteEye was performed by two-way ANOVA with occlusal loading and occlusal area as dependent variables, and clenching strength and presence or absence of implant as between-subject factors.

Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (4)

author: Yukihiko Okada,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Keiichiro Uchida, Tokiko Osawa,Yoshiki ImamuraMayumi Terazawa | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Analysis of the results from Occluzer and BiteEye

The following calculations were performed:

  1. Comparison of Occluzer and BiteEye in the occlusal contact area
  2. Comparison of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load between the implant and same number of natural teeth on the contralateral side
  3. Comparison of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load between molar areas of the implant side and contralateral side
  4. Comparison of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load between molar areas of the implant side and contralateral side excluding the first molar
  5. Comparison of the proportion of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load on the molar region accounted for by the prosthetic implant and contralateral tooth

Analysis of results from Occluzer and BiteEye was performed by two-way ANOVA with occlusal loading and occlusal area as dependent variables, and clenching strength and presence or absence of implant as between-subject factors. The level of significance for multiple comparison tests was set at 5 %.

In addition, multiple comparison test was performed using the Bonferroni method. PASW Statistics 18 was used for all statistical calculations (SPSS, Tokyo, Japan).

 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in