Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Occlusal contact area values obtained with BiteEye and Occluzer at clenching intensities from 20 to 100 % MVC were compared (Fig. 1).

Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)

author: Yukihiko Okada,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Keiichiro Uchida, Tokiko Osawa,Yoshiki ImamuraMayumi Terazawa | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

 

Comparison of occlusal contact areas evaluated using Occluzer and BiteEye

Occlusal contact area values obtained with BiteEye and Occluzer at clenching intensities from 20 to 100 % MVC were compared (Fig. 1). At different clenching intensities, the contact area values of BiteEye with silicone thickness of 10 μm (BE 10 μm) were the most similar to the contact area values of Occluzer. Thus, comparisons of occlusal contact area values between Occluzer and BiteEye were carried out with a silicone thickness of 10 μm.

Comparison of implant region and contralateral tooth

Comparison of occlusal contact area

The occlusal contact area of implant prostheses increased with clenching strength and was always less than that of the contralateral tooth (Fig. 2). ANOVA results (Table 2) show a significant difference between implants and natural teeth with BiteEye (P < 0.05). Multiple comparison test showed that the occlusal contact area of implants was significantly smaller than the occlusal contact area of contralateral teeth with BiteEye at clenching intensities of 40 and 60 % MVC and Occluzer at clenching intensities of 80 and 100 % MVC (P < 0.05).

Comparison of occlusal load

Occlusal load on implant prostheses increased with clenching strength and was always less than that on the contralateral teeth (Fig. 2). At 100 % MVC, the occlusal load on the implant prosthesis was 47.7 ± 39.0 N and that on the contralateral tooth was 81.4 ± 41.1 N. ANOVA results (Table 3) showed a significant interaction in the difference in occlusal load between implants and natural teeth, and clenching strength (P < 0.05). Multiple comparison test showed that the occlusal load was significantly smaller on the implant prostheses than on the contralateral teeth at clenching intensities of 80 and 100 % MVC (P < 0.05).

The rate of increase in occlusal load from 40 to 100 % MVC was 106.1 % for the implant prosthesis and 127.4 % for the contralateral tooth.

 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in