Table 2 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant prosthesis and contralateral tooth
Table 2 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant prosthesis
author: Yukihiko Okada,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Keiichiro Uchida, Tokiko Osawa,Yoshiki ImamuraMayumi Terazawa | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Source | Sum of square | df | Mean square | F value | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occluzer | Implant or natural tooth | 1941.060 | 1 | 1941.060 | 1.074 | 0.333 |
MVC | 424.098 | 3 | 141.336 | 1.958 | 0.147 | |
Interaction | 262.581 | 3 | 87.527 | 1.345 | 0.283 | |
BiteEye | Implant or natural tooth | 28.022 | 1 | 28.022 | 6.892 | 0.030 |
MVC | 3.374 | 2 | 1.687 | 1.927 | 0.178 | |
Interaction | 0.916 | 2 | 0.458 | 0.827 | 0.455 |
Serial posts:
- Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting
- Background : Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (4)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Table 1 Site of implants
- Table 2 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant prosthesis
- Table 3 Two-way ANOVA of occlusal load of implant prosthesis
- Table 4 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant side molar region
- Table 5 Two-way ANOVA of occlusal load of the implant side molar region
- Table 6 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant side molar region
- Table 8 Two-way ANOVA of the proportion of occlusal load and contact area
- Figure 1. Comparison of the occlusal contact area between Occluzer and BiteEye
- Figure 2. Comparison of occlusal contact area and occlusal load between implant and contralateral tooth
- Figure 3. Comparison of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load between the implant side molar region and contralateral side molar region
- Figure 4. Comparison of the first molar-eliminated occlusal contact area
- Figure 5. Proportion of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load