Table 8 Two-way ANOVA of the proportion of occlusal load and contact area for implants and first molars based on molar area
Table 8 Two-way ANOVA of the proportion of occlusal load and contact area
author: Yukihiko Okada,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Keiichiro Uchida, Tokiko Osawa,Yoshiki ImamuraMayumi Terazawa | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 8 Two-way ANOVA of the proportion of occlusal load and contact area for implants and first molars based on molar area
| Source | Sum of square | df | Mean square | F value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occlusal load | ||||||
| Occluzer | Implant or natural tooth | 585.390 | 1 | 585.390 | 9.870 | 0.014 |
| MVC | 53.901 | 3 | 53.901 | 1.768 | 0.220 | |
| Interaction | 46.872 | 3 | 46.872 | 3.791 | 0.870 | |
| Occlusal contact area | ||||||
| Occluzer | Implant or natural tooth | 0.087 | 1 | 0.087 | 11.101 | 0.010 |
| MVC | 0.003 | 3 | 0.003 | 1.202 | 0.305 | |
| Interaction | 0.004 | 3 | 0.004 | 2.178 | 0.178 | |
| BiteEye | Implant or natural tooth | 0.291 | 1 | 0.291 | 12.210 | 0.008 |
| MVC | 0.040 | 2 | 0.040 | 1.287 | 0.290 | |
| Interaction | 0.000 | 2 | 0.000 | 0.070 | 0.798 |
Serial posts:
- Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting
- Background : Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Methods : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (4)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Results : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (1)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (2)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Discussion : Occlusal status of implant superstructures (3)
- Table 1 Site of implants
- Table 2 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant prosthesis
- Table 3 Two-way ANOVA of occlusal load of implant prosthesis
- Table 4 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant side molar region
- Table 5 Two-way ANOVA of occlusal load of the implant side molar region
- Table 6 Two-way ANOVA of the occlusal contact area of the implant side molar region
- Table 8 Two-way ANOVA of the proportion of occlusal load and contact area
- Figure 1. Comparison of the occlusal contact area between Occluzer and BiteEye
- Figure 2. Comparison of occlusal contact area and occlusal load between implant and contralateral tooth
- Figure 3. Comparison of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load between the implant side molar region and contralateral side molar region
- Figure 4. Comparison of the first molar-eliminated occlusal contact area
- Figure 5. Proportion of the occlusal contact area and occlusal load