Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
author: Bartosz Maska, Guo-Hao Lin, Abdullah Othman, Shabnam Behdin, Suncica Travan, Erika Benavides, Yvonne Kapila | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Patient |
Anterior (E1-floor of the sinus) |
Middle (C1-floor of the sinus) |
Posterior (D1-floor of the sinus) |
Thickest (F-floor of the sinus) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.06 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 4.59 |
2 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.34 |
3 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 1.38 | 1.66 |
4 | 4.15 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 6.36 |
5 | 5.64 | 1.33 | 3.73 | 8.42 |
6 | 7.34 | 0.77 | 0.86 | 7.66 |
7 | 1.93 | 9.25 | 6.17 | 12.5 |
8 | 8.22 | 7.89 | 1.62 | 12.27 |
9 | 3.52 | 10.05 | 4.76 | 10.05 |
10 | 7.62 | 0.43 | 2.03 | 8.11 |
11 | 7.19 | 2.75 | 0.77 | 7.62 |
12 | 0.26 | 9.26 | 8.38 | 9.26 |
13 | 0.76 | 19.50 | 0.46 | 22.81 |
14 | 14.95 | 11.33 | 9.67 | 18.92 |
15 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 1.36 | 1.55 |
16 | 0.60 | 3.34 | 1.52 | 4.40 |
17 | 4.44 | 1.82 | 3.60 | 12.25 |
18 | 1.39 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 8.00 |
19 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
20 | 16.27 | 11.11 | 8.07 | 16.27 |
21 | 2.87 | 5.10 | 6.40 | 7.85 |
22 | 5.13 | 0.64 | 4.12 | 5.13 |
23 | 1.19 | 1.36 | 0.25 | 2.48 |
24 | 0.80 | 2.39 | 2.08 | 4.84 |
25 | 19.05 | 16.94 | 10.14 | 20.10 |
26 | 3.51 | 4.25 | 2.63 | 4.25 |
27 | 0.28 | 1.62 | 2.85 | 2.85 |
28 | 9.94 | 7.21 | 5.29 | 11.07 |
29 | 2.56 | 6.28 | 9.98 | 9.98 |
Mean (mm) | 4.63 | 4.87 | 3.46 | 8.34 |
Standard deviation (mm) | 4.95 | 5.10 | 3.17 | 5.70 |
Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Background : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Methods : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- Results : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Discussion : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- Conclusions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Abbreviations : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [3]
- References : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [4]
- Acknowledgements : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [1]
- Author information : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening [2]
- Rights and permissions : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- About this article : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Table 1 CBCT measurements of sinus mucosal thickening : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Table 2 Statistical results after inter-variable adjustment showing the association between recorded parameters and sinus mucosal thickening; p values that showed statistically significant differences are italicized : Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening
- Fig. 1. Figure illustrating the reference points of the CBCT measurements. A: most posterior point of the sinus wall; B: most anterior point of the sinus wall; C: mid-point between A and B; C1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point C; D: mid-point between A and C; D1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point D; E: mid-point between B and C; E1: measurement of mucosal thickening perpendicular to A–B line at point E; F: highest extension of thickened sinus membrane; G–H: height of residual alveolar bone (measured at the mid-point of the edentulous ridge/implant-planned site) : Dental implant
- Fig. 2. Figure illustrating the proposed mucosal thickening index. A ≤1 mm, indicating no thickening; B >1 mm but ≤2 mm, indicating minimal thickening; C >2 mm but ≤5 mm, indicating moderate thickening; D >5 mm, indicating severe thickening : Dental implant