Figure 2. Forest plot
Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
author: Miriam Ting,Matthew Palermo,David P Donatelli,John P Gaughan,Jon B Suzuki, Steven R Jefferies | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Implant diameter (mm) | Implant lengths | No. of implants (total) | Implant type | Implant surface | Prospective clinical study | Placement follow-up/mean (range) | Implant survival (%) | Age range (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | 8, 10, 13, 16 | 117 | Zimmer (Screw vent, Paragon) | Acid-etched, uncoated | Khayat et al. 2001 | Healing 3–6 months plus 17 months loading (11–21 months) | 95 | – |
| 5.0 | 7 | 14 | Endopore (Innova Corp) | Sintered porous | Deporter et al. 2001 | 32.6 months | 100 | 25–76 (53.7) |
| 5.0 | 8.5, 10, 11.5 | 15 | Mark III WP (Nobel Biocare) | Ti-unite | Schincaglia et al. 2008 | 3–4 months healing plus | 100 | 35–68 (49.2) |
| 12 months loading | ||||||||
| 5.0 | 6 | 13 | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | Machined | Friberg et al. 2000 | 8 years (1–14 years) | 100 | 38–93 (63) |
| 5.0 | 6, 7, 8, 8.5, 10 | 109 | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | Machined | Tawil and Younan 2003 | Healing plus 24 months loading | 94.5 | 22–80 (53.6) |
| 5.0 | 7, 8.5, 10, 11.5 | 38 | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | Machined | Polizzi et al. 2000 | 36 months | 92 | 29–69 |
Serial posts:
- A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Review : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Results : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Conclusion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Figure 1. Study selection for wide-diameter implant articles
- Figure 2. Forest plot
- Figure 3. Funnel plot
- Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
- Table 2 Wide surface-treated Implants
- Table 3 Wide machined implants
- Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
- Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
- Table 6 Heterogeneity statistics
- Table 7 Meta-regression—effect of surface and lengths