Table 3 Wide machined implants
Table 3 Wide machined implants
author: Miriam Ting,Matthew Palermo,David P Donatelli,John P Gaughan,Jon B Suzuki, Steven R Jefferies | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Study | Implant surface | Implant type | Implant length | No. of implants | No. failed | % survived |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polizzi et al. 2000 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 7 | 2 | 0 | 100 |
| 8.5 | 8 | 1 | 87.5 | |||
| 10 | 15 | 1 | 93.3 | |||
| 11.5 | 13 | 1 | 92.3 | |||
| Friberg et al. 2000 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 6 | 13 | 0 | 100 |
| Tawil and Younan 2003 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 6 | 16 | 0 | 100 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | 100 | |||
| 8 | 27 | 1 | 96.3 | |||
| 8.5 | 8 | 2 | 75.0 | |||
| 10 | 55 | 3 | 94.5 |
Serial posts:
- A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Review : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Results : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Conclusion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Figure 1. Study selection for wide-diameter implant articles
- Figure 2. Forest plot
- Figure 3. Funnel plot
- Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
- Table 2 Wide surface-treated Implants
- Table 3 Wide machined implants
- Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
- Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
- Table 6 Heterogeneity statistics
- Table 7 Meta-regression—effect of surface and lengths