Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
author: Miriam Ting,Matthew Palermo,David P Donatelli,John P Gaughan,Jon B Suzuki, Steven R Jefferies | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Authors
Number
Success
ci−
ci+
Weight (%)
Polizzi et al.
38
0.921
0.810
0.990
12.71
Friberg et al.
13
1.000
0.872
1.000
4.46
Tawil and Younan
109
0.945
0.893
0.981
36.14
Khayat et al.
111
0.946
0.895
0.982
36.80
Deporter et al.
14
1.000
0.881
1.000
4.79
Schincaglia et al.
15
1.000
0.888
1.000
5.12
300
0.963
0.934
0.985
100
Serial posts:
-
A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
-
Review : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
-
Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
-
Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
-
Results : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
-
Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
-
Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
-
Conclusion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
-
Figure 1. Study selection for wide-diameter implant articles
-
Figure 2. Forest plot
-
Figure 3. Funnel plot
-
Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
-
Table 2 Wide surface-treated Implants
-
Table 3 Wide machined implants
-
Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
-
Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
-
Table 6 Heterogeneity statistics
-
Table 7 Meta-regression—effect of surface and lengths
| Authors | Number | Success | ci− | ci+ | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polizzi et al. | 38 | 0.921 | 0.810 | 0.990 | 12.71 |
| Friberg et al. | 13 | 1.000 | 0.872 | 1.000 | 4.46 |
| Tawil and Younan | 109 | 0.945 | 0.893 | 0.981 | 36.14 |
| Khayat et al. | 111 | 0.946 | 0.895 | 0.982 | 36.80 |
| Deporter et al. | 14 | 1.000 | 0.881 | 1.000 | 4.79 |
| Schincaglia et al. | 15 | 1.000 | 0.888 | 1.000 | 5.12 |
| 300 | 0.963 | 0.934 | 0.985 | 100 |
- A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Review : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Results : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Conclusion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Figure 1. Study selection for wide-diameter implant articles
- Figure 2. Forest plot
- Figure 3. Funnel plot
- Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
- Table 2 Wide surface-treated Implants
- Table 3 Wide machined implants
- Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
- Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
- Table 6 Heterogeneity statistics
- Table 7 Meta-regression—effect of surface and lengths