Table 3 Wide machined implants
Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
author: Miriam Ting,Matthew Palermo,David P Donatelli,John P Gaughan,Jon B Suzuki, Steven R Jefferies | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
| Study | Implant surface | Implant type | No. of implants in maxilla (no. failed) | No. of implants in mandible (no. failed) | % survived in maxilla | % survived in mandible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khayat et al. 2001 | Acid-etched, uncoated | Zimmer (Screw vent, Paragon) | 49 (2) | 62 (4) | 95.9 | 93.5 |
| Deporter et al. 2001 | Sintered porous | Endopore (Innova Corp) | 0 | 14 (0) | – | 100 |
| Schincaglia et al. 2008 | Ti-Unite | Mark III WP (Nobel Biocare) | 0 | 15 (0) | – | 100 |
| Polizzi et al. 2000 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 4 (0) | 34 (3) | 100 | 91.2 |
| Friberg et al. 2000 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 0 | 13 (0) | – | 100 |
| Tawil and Younan 2003 | Machined | Brånemark (Nobel Biocare) | 22 (2) | 87 (4) | 90.9 | 95.4 |
Serial posts:
- A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Review : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Materials and methods : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Results : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (1)
- Discussion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics (2)
- Conclusion : A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics
- Figure 1. Study selection for wide-diameter implant articles
- Figure 2. Forest plot
- Figure 3. Funnel plot
- Table 1 Wide-diameter implants
- Table 2 Wide surface-treated Implants
- Table 3 Wide machined implants
- Table 4 Implants used in the maxilla and mandible
- Table 5 Meta-analysis implant data—pooled analysis
- Table 6 Heterogeneity statistics
- Table 7 Meta-regression—effect of surface and lengths