Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
author: Jonas Lorenz, Henriette Lerner, Robert A Sader, Shahram Ghanaati | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Patient
Implant-localization (region)
Implant loss (+/−)
Buccal width of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm)
Buccal thickness of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm)
Pink Esthetic Score (PES)
Probing depth (mm) at four sites (mb, db, mo, do)
Bleeding on Probing (+/−) at four sites (mb, db, mo, do)
Peri-implant bone loss (mm)
Presence of peri-implant osteolysis (+/−)
1
32
−
2
2
−
3, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
34
−
3
3
−
2, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
42
−
3
2
−
3, 2, 3, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
44
−
2
3
−
3, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
2
36
−
2
3
8
3, 3, 3, 4
−, −, −, +
0.5
−
37
−
2
3
7
2, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0.5
−
46
−
3
2
8
3, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
47
−
3
2
9
3, 4, 3, 4
−, +, −, +
0
−
3
26
−
4
3
8
2, 3, 3, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
4
21
−
3
3
8
2, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
5
23
−
4
2
9
3, 2, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
26
−
3
2
9
3, 3, 3, 4
−, −, −, +
0.5
−
27
−
3
3
8
3, 4, 4, 4
−, +, −, +
1
−
6
32
−
3
2
11
2, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
42
−
2
2
11
2, 1, 1, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
7
36
−
3
2
10
3, 3, 3, 4
−, +, −, −
0.5
−
46
−
2
3
9
4, 5, 3, 4
+, −, +, −
0.5
−
36
−
3
3
10
3, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
3
−
8
16
−
3
2
11
2, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0.5
−
26
−
3
2
10
3, 2, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
1
−
9
27
−
3
2
9
3, 3, 3, 4
−, −, −, +
1
−
10
15
−
4
3
12
3, 2, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
16
−
4
3
11
3, 3, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
17
−
3
2
9
3, 3, 4, 3
−, −, +, −
0
−
24
−
4
4
12
2, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
36
−
2
1
10
3, 4, 3, 3
−, +, −, −
0.5
−
46
−
2
2
9
3, 3, 3, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
11
35
−
3
2
11
2, 2, 3, 2
−, −, −, −
0.5
−
36
−
3
2
11
3, 3, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
1
−
12
16
−
4
2
12
3, 2, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
13
24
−
5
3
12
1, 2, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
25
−
5
2
11
2, 2, 1, 1
−, −, −, −
0
−
26
−
4
2
9
2, 2, 3, 2
−, −,−, −
1
−
46
−
3
2
8
3, 3, 4, 3
−, −, +, −
2
−
14
36
−
3
2
7
4, 3, 3, 2
+, −, −, −
0.5
−
37
−
2
2
10
3, 4, 3, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
15
11
−
4
3
13
2, 2, 3, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
16
36
−
2
2
11
3, 3, 2, 2
−, −, −, −
0.5
−
46
−
3
2
10
3, 4, 3, 3
−, +, −, −
1
−
47
−
2
2
11
3, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
17
14
−
5
2
12
2, 2, 1, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
15
−
4
3
13
2, 2, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
0
−
18
27
−
3
2
11
3, 3, 4, 3
−, +, −, +
1
−
47
−
2
2
9
4, 4, 3, 3
+, −, −, −
2
−
19
22
−
5
3
13
2, 2, 1, 2
−, −, −, −
0
−
24
−
6
3
12
2, 3, 3, 2
−, −, −, −
1
−
20
26
−
4
2
11
3, 3, 2, 3
−, −, −, −
1
−
Total 20
Total 47; 23*u.j, 24*l.j.
Total 0
Mean 3.2 mm (2–6 mm)
Mean 2.4 mm (1–4 mm)
Mean 10.1 (7–13)
Mean 2.7 mm (1–5 mm)
Total 9.6% of the sites; 30% of the implants
Mean 0.55 mm (0–3 mm)
Total 0
Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation
Serial posts:
-
Abstract : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
-
Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
-
Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
-
Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
-
Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
-
Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
-
Results : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
-
Results : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
-
Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
-
Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
-
Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
-
Conclusions : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Abbreviations : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
References : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
-
References : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
-
Author information : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Ethics declarations : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Rights and permissions : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
About this article : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Table 1 Participating patients and the number and site of the inserted implants : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
-
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the technical characteristics of the investigated C-Tech Esthetic Line implant system (provided by the manufacturer) : Investigation of peri-implant
-
Fig. 2. Clinical image of patient 4: a region 21 before implant placement. b, c Implant placement using the GBR procedure with a synthetic bone substitute material composed of HA + β-TCP : Investigation of peri-implant
| Patient | Implant-localization (region) | Implant loss (+/−) | Buccal width of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm) | Buccal thickness of keratinized peri-implant gingiva (mm) | Pink Esthetic Score (PES) | Probing depth (mm) at four sites (mb, db, mo, do) | Bleeding on Probing (+/−) at four sites (mb, db, mo, do) | Peri-implant bone loss (mm) | Presence of peri-implant osteolysis (+/−) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | − | 2 | 2 | − | 3, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 34 | − | 3 | 3 | − | 2, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 42 | − | 3 | 2 | − | 3, 2, 3, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 44 | − | 2 | 3 | − | 3, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 2 | 36 | − | 2 | 3 | 8 | 3, 3, 3, 4 | −, −, −, + | 0.5 | − |
| 37 | − | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0.5 | − | |
| 46 | − | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 47 | − | 3 | 2 | 9 | 3, 4, 3, 4 | −, +, −, + | 0 | − | |
| 3 | 26 | − | 4 | 3 | 8 | 2, 3, 3, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − |
| 4 | 21 | − | 3 | 3 | 8 | 2, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 5 | 23 | − | 4 | 2 | 9 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 26 | − | 3 | 2 | 9 | 3, 3, 3, 4 | −, −, −, + | 0.5 | − | |
| 27 | − | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3, 4, 4, 4 | −, +, −, + | 1 | − | |
| 6 | 32 | − | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − |
| 42 | − | 2 | 2 | 11 | 2, 1, 1, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 7 | 36 | − | 3 | 2 | 10 | 3, 3, 3, 4 | −, +, −, − | 0.5 | − |
| 46 | − | 2 | 3 | 9 | 4, 5, 3, 4 | +, −, +, − | 0.5 | − | |
| 36 | − | 3 | 3 | 10 | 3, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 3 | − | |
| 8 | 16 | − | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0.5 | − |
| 26 | − | 3 | 2 | 10 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 9 | 27 | − | 3 | 2 | 9 | 3, 3, 3, 4 | −, −, −, + | 1 | − |
| 10 | 15 | − | 4 | 3 | 12 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 16 | − | 4 | 3 | 11 | 3, 3, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 17 | − | 3 | 2 | 9 | 3, 3, 4, 3 | −, −, +, − | 0 | − | |
| 24 | − | 4 | 4 | 12 | 2, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 36 | − | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3, 4, 3, 3 | −, +, −, − | 0.5 | − | |
| 46 | − | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3, 3, 3, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 11 | 35 | − | 3 | 2 | 11 | 2, 2, 3, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0.5 | − |
| 36 | − | 3 | 2 | 11 | 3, 3, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 12 | 16 | − | 4 | 2 | 12 | 3, 2, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 13 | 24 | − | 5 | 3 | 12 | 1, 2, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 25 | − | 5 | 2 | 11 | 2, 2, 1, 1 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 26 | − | 4 | 2 | 9 | 2, 2, 3, 2 | −, −,−, − | 1 | − | |
| 46 | − | 3 | 2 | 8 | 3, 3, 4, 3 | −, −, +, − | 2 | − | |
| 14 | 36 | − | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4, 3, 3, 2 | +, −, −, − | 0.5 | − |
| 37 | − | 2 | 2 | 10 | 3, 4, 3, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 15 | 11 | − | 4 | 3 | 13 | 2, 2, 3, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 16 | 36 | − | 2 | 2 | 11 | 3, 3, 2, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0.5 | − |
| 46 | − | 3 | 2 | 10 | 3, 4, 3, 3 | −, +, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 47 | − | 2 | 2 | 11 | 3, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 17 | 14 | − | 5 | 2 | 12 | 2, 2, 1, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 15 | − | 4 | 3 | 13 | 2, 2, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − | |
| 18 | 27 | − | 3 | 2 | 11 | 3, 3, 4, 3 | −, +, −, + | 1 | − |
| 47 | − | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4, 4, 3, 3 | +, −, −, − | 2 | − | |
| 19 | 22 | − | 5 | 3 | 13 | 2, 2, 1, 2 | −, −, −, − | 0 | − |
| 24 | − | 6 | 3 | 12 | 2, 3, 3, 2 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − | |
| 20 | 26 | − | 4 | 2 | 11 | 3, 3, 2, 3 | −, −, −, − | 1 | − |
| Total 20 | Total 47; 23*u.j, 24*l.j. | Total 0 | Mean 3.2 mm (2–6 mm) | Mean 2.4 mm (1–4 mm) | Mean 10.1 (7–13) | Mean 2.7 mm (1–5 mm) | Total 9.6% of the sites; 30% of the implants | Mean 0.55 mm (0–3 mm) | Total 0 |
Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation
- Abstract : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
- Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
- Background : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
- Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
- Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
- Methods : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
- Results : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
- Results : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
- Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
- Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
- Discussion : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [3]
- Conclusions : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Abbreviations : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- References : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [1]
- References : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system [2]
- Author information : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Ethics declarations : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Rights and permissions : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- About this article : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Table 1 Participating patients and the number and site of the inserted implants : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Table 2 Results from the clinical and radiological 3-year follow-up investigation : Investigation of peri-implant tissue conditions and peri-implant tissue stability in implants placed with simultaneous augmentation procedure: a 3-year retrospective follow-up analysis of a newly developed bone level implant system
- Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the technical characteristics of the investigated C-Tech Esthetic Line implant system (provided by the manufacturer) : Investigation of peri-implant
- Fig. 2. Clinical image of patient 4: a region 21 before implant placement. b, c Implant placement using the GBR procedure with a synthetic bone substitute material composed of HA + β-TCP : Investigation of peri-implant