Fig. 5. Total score for physical and psychological disabilities before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Fig. 5. Total score for physical and psychological disabilities before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Fig. 4. Total score for functional limitations before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Fig. 4. Total score for functional limitations before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Fig. 3. Total score for complaints due to surgical procedure pre-operative, post-operative, and recently
Fig. 3. Total score for complaints due to surgical procedure pre-operative, post-operative, and recently
Fig. 2. Cumulative survival rate according to Kaplan–Meier and sinus augmentation procedure
Fig. 2. Cumulative survival rate according to Kaplan–Meier and sinus augmentation procedure
Fig. 1. Flow chart of patients included in the study
Fig. 1. Flow chart of patients included in the study
Item
Mean ± SD pre-operative
Mean ± SD post-operative
Mean ± SD in the last time
Have you felt pain in your mouth?
...
Item
Mean ± SD before sinus lift
Mean ± SD after sinus lift
p value
Have you felt tense because of problems with your teeth, mouth or dentures?
...
Item
Mean ± SD before sinus lift
Mean ± SD after sinus lift
p value
Have you had difficulty chewing any foods?
...
Schiegnitz, E., Kämmerer, P.W., Sagheb, K. et al. Impact of maxillary sinus augmentation on oral health-related quality of life. Int J Implant Dent 3, 10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0072-8
Download citation
Received: 20 November 2016
Accepted: 12 March 2017
Published: 28 March 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0072-8
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were m...
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Augustusplatz 2, 55131, Mainz, Germany
E. Schiegnitz, K. Sagheb, A. Pabst, B. Al-Nawas & M. O. Klein
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
P. W. Kämmerer
Department of Prosthodontics, University of ...
Stellingsma K, Bouma J, Stegenga B, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(2):166–72.
Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant d...
Locker D. Self-esteem and socioeconomic disparities in self-perceived oral health. J Public Health Dent. 2009 Winter;69(1):1-8.
Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(2):141–7.
Ohrn K, Jonsson B. A comparison of two questionnaires measuring oral health-related quality of life before and aft...
Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S219-34.
Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015;94(3 Suppl):44S–51S...
Within the limitations of this study, the results demonstrated a high long-term survival for sinus augmentation procedures and significant improvement of OHRQoL after this procedure. Therefore, sinus augmentation procedures are highly valuable treatment options in implant dentistry.
In order to measure OHRQoL in the present study, a specific and shortened questionnaire based on the validated and reliable OHIP score was developed to consider representative impairments of maxillary sinus augmentation like sinusitis and to relieve the clinical application. In a cross sectional study, Allen et McMillan proofed that a shortened OHIP-14 version showed a similar ability to assess OH...
The clinical and radiological outcomes of sinus augmentation procedures have been published in several studies [1, 3, 6, 7]. However, little data on the physical and psychological impact of this procedure on the patient is available yet. The present study evaluated pre-operative and post-treatment OHRQoL self-assessment scores of patients treated with dental implants after sinus augmentation proce...
Concerning functional limitations, all posed questions showed significant better values for OHRQoL after sinus augmentation procedure than before the treatment (p
After an average time in situ of 41.2 ± 27 months (3.4 years; range 0–96 months), 40 of the 863 implants were lost. These results indicated an in situ rate of 95.4%. One-year and five-year survival rate according to Kaplan–Meier were 95.4 and 94.4%. In patients receiving an external sinus lift an in situ rate of 95.1% and in patients with an internal sinus lift an in situ rate of 96.4%...
The Kaplan–Meier survival function was applied for the description of survival rates. To examine the statistical difference between survival rates, a log-rank test was used. Implant-related data were calculated. For statistical comparison of the paired questions and the total scores, a Wilcoxon test was applied. The intention of this study was descriptive, exploratory without a primary hypothesi...
This retrospective study addresses the oral health-related quality of life after maxillary sinus augmentation. Therefore, all patients that received an implantation after maxillary sinus augmentation in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany, between July 2002 and December 2007 were included in this study. There were no specific exclusion c...
In conclusion, little information is available about patient’s perception of sinus augmentation procedures. The aim of the present study was to assess whether sinus augmentation procedures together with implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation improve quality of life in dental patients using a modified German OHIP and to examine the survival rates after this procedure.
Rehabilitation of completely and partial edentulous patients with dental implants has proved to be a safe and predictable procedure [1–3]. However, reduced bone height and the proximity of the maxillary sinus are challenging limitations for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla [3]. Besides the use of short and tilted implants [4], one of the most frequently used surgical techniques ...
The aim of this study was to measure the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) after maxillary sinus augmentation to determine the physical and psychological impact of this procedure for the patient.
Three hundred sixteen patients treated with an external or internal maxillary sinus augmentation and a total of 863 implants in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Johannes Guten...
Item
Mean ± SD pre-operative
Mean ± SD post-operative
Mean ± SD in the last time
Have you felt pain in your mouth?
0.9 ± 1.1
1.2 ± 1.0
0.3 ± 0.6
Have you had difficulties with your mouth opening?
0.2 ± 0.6
0.5 ± 0.9
0.1 ± 1.0
Have you had painful gums?
0.9 ± 1.0
1.0 ± 1.1
0.5 ± 0.8
Have you had a ...
Item
Mean ± SD before sinus lift
Mean ± SD after sinus lift
p value
Have you felt tense because of problems with your teeth, mouth or dentures?
1.8 ± 1.1
0.8 ± 1.0
Item
Mean ± SD before sinus lift
Mean ± SD after sinus lift
p value
Have you had difficulty chewing any foods?
1.6 ± 1.2
0.4 ± 0.7
Figure 5. Total score for physical and psychological disabilities before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Figure 4. Total score for functional limitations before (gray) and after (hatched) sinus augmentation according to indications
Figure 3. Total score for complaints due to surgical procedure pre-operative, post-operative, and recently
Figure 2. Cumulative survival rate according to Kaplan–Meier and sinus augmentation procedure
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients included in the study
Figure 1. Flow chart of patients included in the study
References
Al-Nawas B, Schiegnitz E. Augmentation procedures using bone substitute materials or autogenous bone—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S219-34.
Derks J, Hakansson J, Wennstrom JL, Tomasi C, Larsson M, Berglundh T. Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss. J Dent Res. 2015;94(...
The authors concluded that in clinical decision-making regarding donor site for bone graft harvesting, patients and clinicians should consider expected decrease in HRQoL if deciding to use extra-oral donor sites. Therefore, the authors recommended to prefer intra-oral donor sites whenever possible. In a recent study of Nickenig et al., OHIP-G 21 was evaluated in 8689 patients with variou...
In this prospective study, health-related quality of life questionnaire was given to 76 patients evaluating patient perception of recovery in the four areas pain, oral function, general activity, and other symptoms. The results showed that average and maximal pain peaked on post-operative day 1 and improved on post-operative days 4 and 5. Difficulty in mouth opening was greatest on pos...
Discussion
The clinical and radiological outcomes of sinus augmentation procedures have been published in several studies. However, little data on the physical and psychological impact of this procedure on the patient is available yet. The present study evaluated pre-operative and post-treatment OHRQoL self-assessment scores of patients treated with dental implants after sinus augmentation ...
In the subcategory physical and psychological disabilities, all questions had significant better values after the sinus lift (p
Results
Survival analysis
After an average time in situ of 41.2 ± 27 months (3.4 years; range 0–96 months), 40 of the 863 implants were lost. These results indicated an in situ rate of 95.4%. One-year and five-year survival rate according to Kaplan–Meier were 95.4 and 94.4%. In patients receiving an external sinus lift an in situ rate of 95.1% and in patients with an internal sinus...
Methods
Study design and subjects
This retrospective study addresses the oral health-related quality of life after maxillary sinus augmentation. Therefore, all patients that received an implantation after maxillary sinus augmentation in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany, between July 2002 and December 2007 were included in this stu...
Background
Rehabilitation of completely and partial edentulous patients with dental implants has proved to be a safe and predictable procedure. However, reduced bone height and the proximity of the maxillary sinus are challenging limitations for dental implant placement in the posterior maxilla. Besides the use of short and tilted implants, one of the most frequently used surgical techniques fo...
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to measure the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) after maxillary sinus augmentation to determine the physical and psychological impact of this procedure for the patient.
Methods
Three hundred sixteen patients treated with an external or internal maxillary sinus augmentation and a total of 863 implants in the Department of Oral and Maxi...