Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
The study analyzed 9982 studies on tooth extractions, removing 6038 duplicates and screening titles and abstracts. 122 papers were left after removing 83 articles due to non-compliance with inclusion requirements. Three studies were left for data synthesis, containing 1896 patients and 4396 extractions. The remaining studies had moderate, high, or low risk of bias. The study was conducted in Croatia, Greece, and Italy.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Adult Tooth Removal Reasons (7)

author: Andreas Tjandra | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
 

Table 2. Study characteristics.

Reference Study design Sample characteristics Age range (y); mean (y) Data collection period Country Patients (n) m/f (%) Extractions (n) Risk of bias*
Chrysanthakopoulos, 2011a Prospective, cross-sectional (questionnaires and clinical examination) Mean number of 20 natural teeth, with good general health, who attended a private practice range 18-76, mean 44.6 ± 5.8 Aug 2007-July 2010 Greece 632 53.8:46.2 1688 6
Chrysanthakopoulos, 2011b Prospective, cross-sectional (questionnaires and clinical examination) Mean number of 20 natural teeth, with good general health, who attended a private practice range 18-74, mean 42.6 ± 5.8 June 2004-May 2009 Greece 1018 55.0:45.0 2462 7
Plančak et al, 2004 Retrospective, cross-sectional (data from dental records) Civilian population during war range 18-59 1995 Croatia 246   246 7
*Risk of bias13: 0-3 low; 4-6 moderate; 7-9 high.

 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in