Acknowledgements : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
The authors acknowledge Mrs. Yupaporn Kiatsakulcharoen and Miss Kamolwan Mangkalad, the Center of Excellent for Dental Implantology, Chiang Mai University for clinical assistance, Mr. Aitthiphon Chongchai, the Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University for laboratory assistance, Dr.Thanapat Sastraruji, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University for statistical consultation, and Dr. M. Kevin O Carroll, Professor Emeritus of the University of Mississippi School of Dentistry, USA, and Faculty Consultant at Chiang Mai University Faculty of Dentistry, Thailand, for critical reading of this manuscript. This study was supported by Chiang Mai University research fund.
CT and PP have made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data and in drafting the manuscript. RPA and KP have been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content and also have given final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Choknapa T is a Master student in Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Peraphan P is a researcher in Thailand Excellence Center for Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Reichart PA is a professor in Department of Oral Medicine, Dental Radiology and Oral Surgery, Center for Dental, Oral and Maxillary Medicine, Charite – University of Medicine, Berlin, Germany. Khongkhunthian P is an associate professor in Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Authors Choknapa Tirachaimongkol, Peraphan Pothacharoen, Peter A. Reichart and Pathawee Khongkhunthian states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [4]
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- Conclusions : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [4]
- Acknowledgements : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Author information : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Rights and permissions : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- About this article : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 2 Profile of patients : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Fig. 1. Timeline of the clinical study. I—implant site, T—contralateral posterior mandibular nonsurgical tooth : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean ISQ values between 1 and 3 weeks (P < 0.05). The ISQ values recovered to the initial ISQ values at 4 weeks and slight increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 3. Change in the median values of the GCF (control group) and PICF (test group) volume over time. In the test group, the PICF volume continuously decreased with time (a). There were no significant differences in the median values of the crevicular fluid volume in either the control group or the test groups at any measurement (b) : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time. In the test group, the ALP level decreased at 1–4 weeks and then increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in the ALP level in either the control or the test groups at any measurement : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time. In the test group, the OC level continuously increased with time. There was a statistically significant increase in the OC level at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks when compared with 1 week (P < 0.05) : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations between the ALP or OC levels and ISQ values at all measurements from week 1 to week 12. At the implant site, the ALP levels in nM/μg protein (a) or the OC levels in pg/μg protein (b) were associated with ISQ values : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 7. Comparison between the trend of the biomarker levels and the trend of the ISQ values over time : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations between the ALP levels and OC levels at all measurements from week 1 to week 12. The OC levels in pg/μg protein were associated with the ALP levels in nM/μg protein at the implant site (a), control site (b), and pooled samples of the control and implant sites (c) : Relation between the stability of dental implant