Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
One hundred and ten patients were invited for follow-up evaluation. All patients were treated in the period from 10/2008 to 02/2015 in the Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz. Inclusion criteria were as follows: implant placement of a NobelActive implant, study subjects over 18 years old, residual bone dimension in the edentulous region of at least 5 mm in height and 4 mm in width, placement torque of at least 35 Ncm, non-smokers, and a follow-up period of least 1 year after implant placement. Exclusion criterion was treatment with bisphosphonates.
From a total of 110 invited patients, 98 patients showed up for a follow-up evaluation of the clinical and radiological status of the implants and fulfilled the abovementioned criteria. Twelve patients were dropped out because of sudden death (n = 1), moved to another place (n = 4) and were incompliant and did not appear for the follow-up (n = 7). The rest 98 patients included into the study were stratified into different groups according to risk factors (RFs) (local, systematic, both of them, or without risk factor), implant region, implant diameter, implant length, time of implant placement, and time of implant restoration.
Systematic risk factors included poorly controlled diabetes (HbA1c > 7%), irradiation (range; 58–64 Gy), chemotherapy (“EURO-E.W.I.N.G.99”—consisted of vincristin, ifosfamid, doxorubicin, and etoposid in one patient after resection of a sarcoma in the upper jaw), long-term therapy with corticosteroids (≥ 7.5 mg of prednisone equivalent per day during at least 90 days consecutive) [17, 18], and presence of Marfan syndrome. Local risk factors included history of severe [19, 20] periodontitis (clinical attachment loss > 5 mm)—which was not active at the time of implant placement—unsuccessful endodontic treatment with periapical pathology, implant placement in cases with moderate or severe bone defects (> 4 mm need for augmentation according to the Cologne Classification of alveolar ridge defects [21]), and replacement after removal of a previous implant (Table 1). Other co-existent diseases that do not influence the implant survival were not considered systemic risk factors.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Introduction : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Introduction : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [5]
- Acknowledgements : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- About this article : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Table 1 Distribution of patients with local and systemic risk factors (Of: Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant)
- Table 2 Clinical parameters and reason for implant failures of 15 implants in 12 patients (Of: Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant)
- Fig. 1. On Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, the cumulative survival rate was 91.5% : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant
- Fig. 2. The cumulative survival rates for the different RF groups revealing a significant difference for patients without any and patients with local and systemic RFs (log rank, p = 0.006) : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant
- Abstract : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Background : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Methods : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Methods : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Results : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Results : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Discussion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Discussion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Conclusion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Abbreviations : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [3]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [4]
- Acknowledgements : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Author information : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Ethics declarations : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Rights and permissions : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- About this article : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Table 1 BoP, PI, and PPD mean values at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months (Of: Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant)
- Fig. 1. Electric toothbrush heads: on the left is the one designed for natural teeth, and on the right is the one designed for dental implants : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 2. Patients’ population flow chart : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 3. PI on dental implants. Test values keep reducing after 1 month while control maintains the same level : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 4. PI on natural teeth. After 1 month, the test group showed mild reduction while control a light improvement : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 5. BoP on dental implants. It can be observed how the values keep decreasing after 1 month only in the test group : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 6. BoP on natural teeth. While the control group shows a mild increase between 1 month and 3 months, the test group values decrease during all the duration of the study : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 7. PPD on dental implants. No significant differences appreciable : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 8. PPD on natural teeth. No significant differences appreciable : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant