References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Prosthetic treatment planning on the basis of scientific evidence. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(Suppl 1):72–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01824.x PubMed PMID: 18181936.
Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):119–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x Epub 2007/12/07. PubMed PMID: 18067597.
Zhuang LF, Watt RM, Mattheos N, Si MS, Lai HC, Lang NP. Periodontal and peri-implant microbiota in patients with healthy and inflamed periodontal and peri-implant tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12508 Epub 2014/11/14. PubMed PMID: 25399962.
Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59(1):59–63 PubMed PMID: 3422305.
Karoussis IK, Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):669–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01406.x Epub 2007/09/13. PubMed PMID: 17868376.
van der Weijden GA, Hioe KP. A systematic review of the effectiveness of self-performed mechanical plaque removal in adults with gingivitis using a manual toothbrush. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(Suppl 6):214–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00795.x PubMed PMID: 16128840.
Dalago HR, Schuldt Filho G, Rodrigues MA, Renvert S, Bianchini MA. Risk indicators for peri-implantitis. A cross-sectional study with 916 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(2):144–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12772 Epub 2016/01/11. PubMed PMID: 26754342.
Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(4):329–36 PubMed PMID: 9151599.
Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):440–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01137.x PubMed PMID: 16117768.
Costa FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO, Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Costa JE. Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(2):173–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x Epub 2011/11/23. PubMed PMID: 22111654.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Introduction : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Introduction : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- Material and methods : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Results : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- Discussion : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- Conclusions : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [1]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [2]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [3]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [4]
- References : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data [5]
- Acknowledgements : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Author information : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Ethics declarations : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Rights and permissions : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- About this article : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data
- Table 1 Distribution of patients with local and systemic risk factors (Of: Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant)
- Table 2 Clinical parameters and reason for implant failures of 15 implants in 12 patients (Of: Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant)
- Fig. 1. On Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, the cumulative survival rate was 91.5% : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant
- Fig. 2. The cumulative survival rates for the different RF groups revealing a significant difference for patients without any and patients with local and systemic RFs (log rank, p = 0.006) : Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant
- Abstract : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Background : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Methods : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Methods : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Results : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Results : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Discussion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- Discussion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- Conclusion : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Abbreviations : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [1]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [2]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [3]
- References : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial [4]
- Acknowledgements : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Author information : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Ethics declarations : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Rights and permissions : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- About this article : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implants: a randomized clinical trial
- Table 1 BoP, PI, and PPD mean values at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months (Of: Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant)
- Fig. 1. Electric toothbrush heads: on the left is the one designed for natural teeth, and on the right is the one designed for dental implants : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 2. Patients’ population flow chart : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 3. PI on dental implants. Test values keep reducing after 1 month while control maintains the same level : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 4. PI on natural teeth. After 1 month, the test group showed mild reduction while control a light improvement : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 5. BoP on dental implants. It can be observed how the values keep decreasing after 1 month only in the test group : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 6. BoP on natural teeth. While the control group shows a mild increase between 1 month and 3 months, the test group values decrease during all the duration of the study : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 7. PPD on dental implants. No significant differences appreciable : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant
- Fig. 8. PPD on natural teeth. No significant differences appreciable : Effectiveness and compliance of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush in patients with dental implant