Methods : Effect of implant design on primary stability
Methods
Implants
The type of implant used for the experiments and the characteristics of its design are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1, respectively. Figure 1 shows that the implant is compressed longitudinally to one third. The outer surface of the implant is indicated with a solid line, and the inner surface of the implant is indicated with a dotted line.
Preparation of an implant socket in artificial bone
For artificial bone, rigid polyurethane foam (Solid Rigid Polyurethane Foam 20 pcf; Sawbones; Pacific Research Laboratories Inc., USA) measuring 18 × 4 × 13 cm and approaching the maxilla molar part bone density (0.32 g/cc) and physical properties (compressive strength, 8.4 MPa; tensile strength, 5.6 MPa; shear strength, 4.3 MPa; coefficient of elasticity, 284 GPa) [24] was employed. An implant socket was formed by making an interval of more than 2 cm, while avoiding axis wobbling as much as possible, with a drill press (ASD-360; Ashina, Hiroshima, Japan) in the artificial bone.
Measurement of torque-time curves
For measurement of torque-time curves, a torque measurement system capable of high-speed sampling at 1 sample/ms (PC torque analyzer TRQ-5DRU; Vectrix, Tokyo, Japan) was used. The rotational speed at the time of insertion was 15 rpm, the load was 500 g, and the maximum torque value indicated in the torque-time curve (and following implant torque curve) when inserting the implant (Osseoset 200; Nobel Biocare Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was assumed as the insertion torque value. In addition, the removal torque value (RT) was obtained from the removal torque curve when the implant was reversed immediately after insertion.
Measurement of the rate of torque rise
The average torque rise rate (N · cm/s) in each region was obtained from the point that the origin and torque rose immediately after implantation, with both ends of the region indicating lines, both ends of the region indicating a quadratic function, and the torque values and implant time of both ends indicating a logarithmic function becoming gradual on the implant torque curve, and mean values and SD were calculated.
Statistical analysis
It was confirmed that the measurement results for the insertion and removal torque values of each implant were normally distributed, and their significant differences were examined by Student’s t test and the Tukey–Kramer method (JMP software; SAS Institute Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The significance level was set at p = 0.05.
Serial posts:
- Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone
- Background : Effect of implant design on primary stability
- Methods : Effect of implant design on primary stability
- Results : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
- Results : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (3)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
- Reference : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
- Table 1 The type of the implant used for experiment
- Table 2 Insertion torque value and removal torque value
- Table 3 Torque rise rate of the each area (N · cm/s)
- Figure 1. Compressed longitudinally to one third for characteristics of implant design
- Figure 2. Torque-time curves of the ST. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 3. Torque-time curves of the BL. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 4. Torque-time curves of the TE. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 5. Torque-time curves of the MK3 and MK4