Table 2 Insertion torque value and removal torque value
Table 2 Insertion torque value and removal torque value
author: Yoko Yamaguchi,Makoto Shiota,Motohiro Munakata,Shohei Kasugai, Masahiko Ozeki | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Code
Insertion torque
Removal torque
Effective thread length (ETL)
(N · cm)
(N · cm)
(×π mm)
ST6
6.19 ± 0.716
5.95 ± 0.718
11.53
ST8
8.06 ± 1.038
9.09 ± 1.093
15.11
ST10
13.13 ± 1.763
12.37 ± 1.746
21.48
BL8
17.67 ± 1.290
16.67 ± 2.140
20.88
BL10
23.56 ± 1.628
21.99 ± 1.530
31.00
BL12
26.66 ± 3.897
24.40 ± 2.298
39.96
TE10
25.17 ± 2.374
23.76 ± 2.027
31.11
MK3
16.03 ± 0.516
10.30 ± 0.708
39.38
MK4
39.35 ± 0.494
34.31 ± 0502
54.81
±:SD
Serial posts:
-
Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone
-
Background : Effect of implant design on primary stability
-
Methods : Effect of implant design on primary stability
-
Results : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
-
Results : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
-
Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
-
Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
-
Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (3)
-
Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
-
Reference : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
-
Table 1 The type of the implant used for experiment
-
Table 2 Insertion torque value and removal torque value
-
Table 3 Torque rise rate of the each area (N · cm/s)
-
Figure 1. Compressed longitudinally to one third for characteristics of implant design
-
Figure 2. Torque-time curves of the ST. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
-
Figure 3. Torque-time curves of the BL. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
-
Figure 4. Torque-time curves of the TE. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
-
Figure 5. Torque-time curves of the MK3 and MK4
| Code | Insertion torque | Removal torque | Effective thread length (ETL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N · cm) | (N · cm) | (×π mm) | |
| ST6 | 6.19 ± 0.716 | 5.95 ± 0.718 | 11.53 |
| ST8 | 8.06 ± 1.038 | 9.09 ± 1.093 | 15.11 |
| ST10 | 13.13 ± 1.763 | 12.37 ± 1.746 | 21.48 |
| BL8 | 17.67 ± 1.290 | 16.67 ± 2.140 | 20.88 |
| BL10 | 23.56 ± 1.628 | 21.99 ± 1.530 | 31.00 |
| BL12 | 26.66 ± 3.897 | 24.40 ± 2.298 | 39.96 |
| TE10 | 25.17 ± 2.374 | 23.76 ± 2.027 | 31.11 |
| MK3 | 16.03 ± 0.516 | 10.30 ± 0.708 | 39.38 |
| MK4 | 39.35 ± 0.494 | 34.31 ± 0502 | 54.81 |
| ±:SD | |||
- Effect of implant design on primary stability using torque-time curves in artificial bone
- Background : Effect of implant design on primary stability
- Methods : Effect of implant design on primary stability
- Results : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
- Results : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (1)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (2)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (3)
- Discussion : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
- Reference : Effect of implant design on primary (4)
- Table 1 The type of the implant used for experiment
- Table 2 Insertion torque value and removal torque value
- Table 3 Torque rise rate of the each area (N · cm/s)
- Figure 1. Compressed longitudinally to one third for characteristics of implant design
- Figure 2. Torque-time curves of the ST. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 3. Torque-time curves of the BL. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 4. Torque-time curves of the TE. a Insertion torque. b Removal torque
- Figure 5. Torque-time curves of the MK3 and MK4