References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [4]
Araujo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J. Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1–8.
Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Coggiola A, Di Martino G, Anello T, Romeo E. Clinical outcome of the use of fresh frozen allogeneic bone grafts for the reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridges: preliminary results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:450–60.
Deluiz D, Santos Oliveira L, Ramoa Pires F, Reiner T, Armada L, Nunes MA, et al. Incorporation and Remodeling of Bone Block Allografts in the Maxillary Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:180–94.
Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7:153–71.
Gruber R, Stadlinger B, Terheyden H. Cell-to-cell communication in guided bone regeneration: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016.
Araujo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:55–64.
Lindhe J, Araujo MG, Bufler M, Liljenberg B. Biphasic alloplastic graft used to preserve the dimension of the edentulous ridge: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1158–63.
Galindo-Moreno P, Hernandez-Cortes P, Aneiros-Fernandez J, Camara M, Mesa F, Wallace S, et al. Morphological evidences of Bio-Oss(R) colonization by CD44-positive cells. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:366–71.
Stucki U, Schmid J, Hammerle CF, Lang NP. Temporal and local appearance of alkaline phosphatase activity in early stages of guided bone regeneration. A descriptive histochemical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:121–7.
Hawthorne AC, Xavier SP, Okamoto R, Salvador SL, Antunes AA, Salata LA. Immunohistochemical, tomographic, and histological study on onlay bone graft remodeling. Part III: allografts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1164–72.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Background : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Methods : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [1]
- Methods : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [2]
- Methods : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [3]
- Methods : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [4]
- Results : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [1]
- Results : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [2]
- Discussion : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [1]
- Discussion : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [2]
- Discussion : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [3]
- Conclusions : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Abbreviations : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [1]
- References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [2]
- References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [3]
- References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [4]
- References : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [5]
- Acknowledgements : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [1]
- Acknowledgements : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement [2]
- Author information : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Rights and permissions : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- About this article : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Table 1 Clinical and histomorphometry assessments (i.e., dehiscences, mineralized bone, CCXBB, bone marrow, connective tissue, and implant lost) : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Table 2 Quantitative histological analysis : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Table 3 Immunohistochemical markers proportions (i.e., TRAP, OPN, ALP, and OSC) : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Table 4 Implant loss and tissue characteristics : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant placement
- Fig. 1. Study chart and follow-up visits : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 2. Lateral bone augmentation of the alveolar crest (a) atrophic ridge. b Perforations and adaptation of the cortical layer. c Shaping, pre-wetting and fixation of CCXBB with titanium screws. d Horizontal contour and peripheral gap between CCXBB and bone layer. e Outlying DBBM filling. f CM stabilized with pins : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 3. Re-entry procedure of patient in Fig. 1. a Buccal aspect of the augmented region. b Horizontal bone augmentation. c Screws and pins removal and bone trephine sampling. d Implants placement and buccal bone width from the implant shoulder. e Primary flap closure. f Implants submerged healing : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 4. Histological samples. a CCXBB control without implantation. b Histologic samples with acute inflammatory infiltration. c Histologic sample with limited remaining CCXBB and large bone ingrowth : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 5. Histomorphometric analysis of the same sample. a Ground section stained with Levai-Laczkó. b Tissue identification of the ROI. c Closer view aarrow pointing a cement line between new mineralized bone and CCXBB. d Closer view of b : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 6. Immunohistochemical analysis of slices from the same sample with four different markers. a TRAP. b OPN. c ALP. d OSC : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 7. Second stage surgery of patient in Fig. 1. a Vestibular depth reduction after augmentation and implant placement. b Partial thickness and apical repositioned flap. c CMX healing and soft tissue dehiscence with CCXBB exposure. d Dehiscence healing after re-contouring and buccal emergency profile. e Buccal aspect of the final restoration. f Buccal ridge contour : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant
- Fig. 8. Soft tissue dehiscence (a) CCXBB exposure 15 weeks after bone augmentation, the dehiscence healed 2 weeks later after reducing the graft exposure (b) after soft tissue augmentation and abutment connection leading to the loss of the mesial implant. After partial removal of the bone graft and place a connective tissue graft the area healed properly and a month later it was possible to replace the implant : Histomorphometric and immunohistochemical evaluation of collagen containing xenogeneic bone blocks used for lateral bone augmentation in staged implant