Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
Ten patients, seven females, and three males, aged 42.4 ± 11.99 years (range, 28 to 64 years), with either a first mandibular or second mandibular molar edentulous area, who required a single nonsubmerged implant participated in this study, as shown in Table 2. The implants used for all patients were 10 mm long and 5 mm in diameter. All patients completed the follow-up. None of the implants failed during the study period.
The mean ISQ values were shown in Table 3. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean ISQ values between 1 and 3 weeks (P < 0.05). The ISQ values recovered to the initial ISQ values at 4 weeks and slight increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks (Fig. 2). There was a significant increase in the mean ISQ values at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks when compared with 3 weeks. The mean lowest ISQ values, recorded at 1 week, were 65.6 ± 2.70. According to the independent samples t test, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean ISQ values with gender and bone quality.
The median values of the GCF and PICF volume are shown in Table 4. At the implant site (test group), the PICF volume continuously decreased with time (Fig. 3). However, according to the Friedman test, there were no significant differences in the median values of the crevicular fluid volume in the control or the test group at each measurement.
Both ALP and OC molecules were detectable in GCF and PICF samples. The median values of the ALP and OC levels are shown in Table 5. In the control group, there was no significant difference in the ALP or the OC levels at each measurement. In the test group (implant site), the ALP level decreased at 1–4 weeks and then increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks (Fig. 4). However, according to the Friedman test, there was no statistically significant difference in the ALP level of the test group at each measurement. Furthermore, according to the Mann-Whitney U test, there was no statistically significant difference in the ALP level between the control and the test group at each measurement.
Serial posts:
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Background : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- Methods : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [4]
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- Results : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- Discussion : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- Conclusions : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [1]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [2]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [3]
- References : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study [4]
- Acknowledgements : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Author information : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Rights and permissions : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- About this article : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 2 Profile of patients : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 3 ISQ values according to gender and bone quality : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 4 Crevicular fluid volume : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Table 5 Crevicular fluid ALP and OC levels : Relation between the stability of dental implants and two biological markers during the healing period: a prospective clinical study
- Fig. 1. Timeline of the clinical study. I—implant site, T—contralateral posterior mandibular nonsurgical tooth : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 2. Change in the mean ISQ values over time. There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean ISQ values between 1 and 3 weeks (P < 0.05). The ISQ values recovered to the initial ISQ values at 4 weeks and slight increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 3. Change in the median values of the GCF (control group) and PICF (test group) volume over time. In the test group, the PICF volume continuously decreased with time (a). There were no significant differences in the median values of the crevicular fluid volume in either the control group or the test groups at any measurement (b) : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 4. Change in the median values of the ALP level over time. In the test group, the ALP level decreased at 1–4 weeks and then increased at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in the ALP level in either the control or the test groups at any measurement : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 5. Change in the median values of the OC level over time. In the test group, the OC level continuously increased with time. There was a statistically significant increase in the OC level at 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks when compared with 1 week (P < 0.05) : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 6. There were weakly significant and positive correlations between the ALP or OC levels and ISQ values at all measurements from week 1 to week 12. At the implant site, the ALP levels in nM/μg protein (a) or the OC levels in pg/μg protein (b) were associated with ISQ values : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 7. Comparison between the trend of the biomarker levels and the trend of the ISQ values over time : Relation between the stability of dental implant
- Fig. 8. There were moderately significant and positive correlations between the ALP levels and OC levels at all measurements from week 1 to week 12. The OC levels in pg/μg protein were associated with the ALP levels in nM/μg protein at the implant site (a), control site (b), and pooled samples of the control and implant sites (c) : Relation between the stability of dental implant