Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants (μm) under loading in experimental models
Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
author: Yuta Shimura,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Miyuki Omori | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants (μm) under loading in experimental models
| Models | Displacement (μm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Buccal loading | Central loading | Lingual loading | |
| Buccal offset | 54.60 ± 8.53 | 37.39 ± 5.53 | 40.22 ± 4.24 |
| Straight | 80.66 ± 7.47 | 52.92 ± 1.07 | 63.03 ± 3.69 |
| Lingual offset | 53.11 ± 4.35 | 40.36 ± 3.18 | 48.22 ± 4.18 |
Serial posts:
- Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Background : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (5)
- References : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Figure 1. An artificial mandible
- Figure 2. Three implants were embedded in an artificial mandible
- Figure 3. Three different models with different placements
- Figure 4. Experimental model. (a) Buccal load, (b) central load, and (c) lingual load
- Figure 5. Application of strain gauges
- Figure 6. Loading test in the experimental model
- Figure 7. A finite element analysis (FEA) model
- Figure 8. The displacement of the implants under loading in experimental models
- Figure 9. The displacement of the implants under loading in finite element analysis (FEA) models
- Figure 11. The strain around the no. 36 implant in the experimental models
- Figure 12. The strain around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 13. The distribution of equivalent stress around the peri-implant bone
- Figure 14. The distribution of equivalent stress around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 15. Load supporting area in the superstructures
- Table 1 Mechanical properties of materials used in the FEA models
- Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 3 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 5 Tukey’s test for strain B in the experimental models
- Table 6 Tukey’s test for strain L in the experimental models
- Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 8 Tukey’s test for strain B in the FEA models
- Table 9 Tukey’s test for strain L in the FEA models