Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant (με) in the finite element analysis (FEA) models
Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
author: Yuta Shimura,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Miyuki Omori | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant (με) in the finite element analysis (FEA) models
| Models | Loading | Strain (με) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain M | Strain B | Strain D | Strain L | ||
| Buccal offset | Buccal loading | −222.34 ± 158.56 | −934.84 ± 76.82 | 252.11 ± 103.72 | −98.32 95.94 |
| Central loading | −336.26 ± 94.27 | −477.17 ± 87.68 | 35.05 ± 102.98 | −385.89 ± 240.13 | |
| Lingual loading | −448.13 ± 78.51 | −49.85 ± 139.33 | −210.45 ± 206.82 | −676.08 ± 383.54 | |
| Straight | Buccal loading | −203.99 ± 99.82 | −1717.66 ± 179.51 | 124.50 ± 30.18 | −72.26 ± 86.36 |
| Central loading | −151.55 ± 110.05 | −857.84 ± 83.22 | 21.12 ± 157.01 | −447.40 ± 140.88 | |
| Lingual loading | −94.09 ± 97.43 | −95.19 ± 81.18 | −47.47 ± 275.05 | −817.47 ± 215.71 | |
| Lingual offset | Buccal loading | −397.70 ± 51.11 | −1121.79 ± 453.39 | −68.01 ± 87.44 | −204.14 ± 14.05 |
| Central loading | −293.21 ± 56.29 | −574.07 ± 261.34 | −176.54 ± 16.66 | −696.83 ± 87.11 | |
| Lingual loading | −175.14 ± 171.13 | −3.47 ± 51.47 | −289.54 ± 78.95 | −1248.16 ± 180.57 | |
Serial posts:
- Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Background : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (5)
- References : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Figure 1. An artificial mandible
- Figure 2. Three implants were embedded in an artificial mandible
- Figure 3. Three different models with different placements
- Figure 4. Experimental model. (a) Buccal load, (b) central load, and (c) lingual load
- Figure 5. Application of strain gauges
- Figure 6. Loading test in the experimental model
- Figure 7. A finite element analysis (FEA) model
- Figure 8. The displacement of the implants under loading in experimental models
- Figure 9. The displacement of the implants under loading in finite element analysis (FEA) models
- Figure 11. The strain around the no. 36 implant in the experimental models
- Figure 12. The strain around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 13. The distribution of equivalent stress around the peri-implant bone
- Figure 14. The distribution of equivalent stress around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 15. Load supporting area in the superstructures
- Table 1 Mechanical properties of materials used in the FEA models
- Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 3 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 5 Tukey’s test for strain B in the experimental models
- Table 6 Tukey’s test for strain L in the experimental models
- Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 8 Tukey’s test for strain B in the FEA models
- Table 9 Tukey’s test for strain L in the FEA models