Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant (με) in the experimental models
Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
author: Yuta Shimura,Yuji Sato,Noboru Kitagawa,Miyuki Omori | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant (με) in the experimental models
| Models | Loading | Strain (με) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain M | Strain B | Strain D | Strain L | ||
| Buccal offset | Buccal loading | −599.33 ± 595.46 | −4507.35 ± 1192.62 | 1164.77 ± 169.94 | −148.09 ± 174.19 |
| Central loading | −697.29 ± 651.92 | −2526.69 ± 570.91 | 1272.93 ± 144.11 | −1038.21 ± 151.61 | |
| Lingual loading | −928.19 ± 779.29 | −536.22 ± 431.65 | 1458.01 ± 281.15 | −1997.40 ± 93.43 | |
| Straight | Buccal loading | −0.64 ± 762.69 | −2462.40 ± 2202.81 | 650.61 ± 926.87 | 7.84 ± 171.37 |
| Central loading | 7.80 ± 597.37 | −907.59 ± 1126.39 | 608.12 ± 804.44 | −1131.15 ± 713.48 | |
| Lingual loading | −46.63 ± 503.19 | 374.18 ± 85.59 | 535.71 ± 624.55 | −2135.81 ± 1341.85 | |
| Lingual offset | Buccal loading | 137.71 ± 198.50 | −1116.87 ± 846.02 | 442.81 ± 620.37 | −441.78 ± 735.38 |
| Central loading | 157.83 ± 137.02 | −494.15 ± 565.61 | 18.56 ± 645.98 | −1236.11 ± 1290.83 | |
| Lingual loading | 171.26 ± 104.51 | 125.42 ± 283.74 | −234.42 ± 662.75 | −2085.35 ± 1804.50 | |
Serial posts:
- Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Background : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Methods : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Results : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (4)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants (5)
- References : Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants
- Figure 1. An artificial mandible
- Figure 2. Three implants were embedded in an artificial mandible
- Figure 3. Three different models with different placements
- Figure 4. Experimental model. (a) Buccal load, (b) central load, and (c) lingual load
- Figure 5. Application of strain gauges
- Figure 6. Loading test in the experimental model
- Figure 7. A finite element analysis (FEA) model
- Figure 8. The displacement of the implants under loading in experimental models
- Figure 9. The displacement of the implants under loading in finite element analysis (FEA) models
- Figure 11. The strain around the no. 36 implant in the experimental models
- Figure 12. The strain around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 13. The distribution of equivalent stress around the peri-implant bone
- Figure 14. The distribution of equivalent stress around the no. 36 implant
- Figure 15. Load supporting area in the superstructures
- Table 1 Mechanical properties of materials used in the FEA models
- Table 2 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 3 Means and standard deviations (SD) of displacement of the implants
- Table 4 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 5 Tukey’s test for strain B in the experimental models
- Table 6 Tukey’s test for strain L in the experimental models
- Table 7 Means and standard deviations (SD) of strain around the no. 36 implant
- Table 8 Tukey’s test for strain B in the FEA models
- Table 9 Tukey’s test for strain L in the FEA models