Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (4)
Besides, in the model reported in this study, microscopic examinations are possible after completing the experiment only. Nevertheless, an advantage of the new flow chamber is the possibility of testing different cell colonies simultaneously in one single experiment by placing cells in different radial locations on the spinning disc. Due to the current flow gradient from the centre to the periphery, different cell colonies are exposed to various levels of shear forces. To simplify the process of cell reaction examination, the use of a larger sized glass panel could be considered.
Biomaterial researchers are constantly looking for innovative materials like surface-binding ligands and implant materials, pursuing the aim of improving biocompatibility and healing into host tissues. For this purpose, this new developed flow chamber could provide an easy, as well as economic way to investigate material qualities in combination with tissue cells affected by FSS. A specific material to be tested could replace the cell-bearing glass panel. Alternatively, the glass panel could be coated with surface ligands in different ways. A potential use for evaluation of stem cell differentiation and/or proliferation with fluid shear stress as a mechanical stimulus may be assumed as well.
Conclusions
To create fluid shear stress under in vitro conditions, several flow chambers have been developed in the past. The experimental setup of the flow chamber in the centre of this study offers advantages such as simplicity to assemble and ease of use as well as the creation of reproducible fluid shear forces on cells. Due to the new design, different cell types could be simultaneously analysed under reproducible conditions, by placing them in different radial positions. As a result of an increasing flow gradient from the centre to the periphery, different shear forces become available in one single experiment without changing the rotational speed level. Besides, cellular changes in osteoblast morphology and orientation using this model of fluid shear stress were proven.
Abbreviations
- FSS:
-
Fluid shear stress
Serial posts:
- Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (3)
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (3)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (4)
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces
- Figure 1. Three-dimensional illustration and photography
- Figure 2. Side view of a computerized simulation
- Figure 3. Diagram for visualisation of the calculation of shear stress rates
- Figure 4. Randomly orientated osteoblasts without influence of rotation
- Figure 5. Osteoblasts with an orientation tendency after 24 h