Figure 1. Three-dimensional illustration and photography
author: P W Kmmerer,D G E Thiem,A Alshihri,G H Wittstock,R Bader,B Al-Nawas, M O Klein | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
![Figure 1. Three-dimensional illustration (a–e) and photography (f) of the experimental setup with the components marked numerical. a 1 Lower petri dish (s’ bottom serving as the lower plate); 2 Rotating glass panel [60 mm diameter (cell bearing)]; 3 Titanium axis. b 4 Liquid medium (red). c 5 Reversed upper petri dish. d 6 Gearwheel with set screw. e 7 Closing; 8 Electronic motor device and adjusting ring with additional set screw](https://palmerah.implantgigi.com/insight/image/1/Figure_1_Three_dimensional_illustration.jpeg "Figure 1. Three-dimensional illustration (a–e) and photography (f) of the experimental setup with the components marked numerical. a 1 Lower petri dish (s’ bottom serving as the lower plate); 2 Rotating glass panel [60 mm diameter (cell bearing)]; 3 Titanium axis. b 4 Liquid medium (red). c 5 Reversed upper petri dish. d 6 Gearwheel with set screw. e 7 Closing; 8 Electronic motor device and adjusting ring with additional set screw")
Serial posts:
- Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Methods : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (3)
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Results : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (1)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (2)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (3)
- Discussion : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces (4)
- References : Cellular fluid shear stress on implant surfaces
- Figure 1. Three-dimensional illustration and photography
- Figure 2. Side view of a computerized simulation
- Figure 3. Diagram for visualisation of the calculation of shear stress rates
- Figure 4. Randomly orientated osteoblasts without influence of rotation
- Figure 5. Osteoblasts with an orientation tendency after 24 h