Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (5)
Although EDS analysis was performed in three areas on each sample, the atomic percentage of carbon on the contaminated area was higher than that on the clean area and the atomic percentage of titanium was lower on the contaminated areas than on the clean area except cathodic potential 1 A and 1.5 A in group III. The possible sources of carbon contamination in the EDS analysis are not yet confirmed. In our study, carbon peak was not detected in the surfaces treated with cathodic potential 1 A and 1.5 A in group III suggesting that there was no organic contamination on the surfaces. Copper was seen on the sample after electrolysis of anodic potential in group II suggesting that using the copper electrode at anodic potential has fairly limited potential for electrolytic cleaning performed in this study because using copper as electrode at anodic potential may initiate the electroplating process in which copper particles can deposit on the metal surface.
The limitations of the current study included only titanium healing abutments were evaluated after electrolysis; other contaminated components are considered in need of future evaluation. Although electrochemical treatment with 7.5% NaHCO3 in group III had no detrimental effects to the surface, further investigation should aim to access the current approach in an animal model for peri-implantitis. Our findings showed that using 7.5% NaHCO3 electrolyte in a short time (5 min) of cathodic potential of 1 A in group III can provide an alternative treatment system for cleaning the contaminated healing abutments; SEM showed no visible alterations on the surface of the healing abutments and the EDS analysis confirmed no signs of organic contamination on the surfaces.
Conclusion
Despite the limitation of this study, the present results suggested that electrolysis of using carbon as electrodes, placing the contaminated healing abutments on cathode and applying an electric current of 1 A at constant 10 V in 7.5% sodium bicarbonate could completely remove organic contaminants from the surfaces. The findings of the present study could prompt further research into this newly established method. In particular, this optimized electrochemical cleaning method seems to be well worth investigation for the clinical management of peri-implant infections.
Serial posts:
- Investigation of different electrochemical cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments in vitro: an approach for metal surface decontamination
- Background : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments
- Materials and methods : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments
- Results : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (1)
- Results : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (2)
- Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (1)
- CLONE-Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (2)
- Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (2)
- Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (3)
- Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (4)
- Discussion : cleaning methods on contaminated healing abutments (5)
- Table 1 pH after electrolysis.
- Table 2 Qualitative analysis of surfaces after electrolysis
- Table 3 Composition (%wt) of the surface of the healing abutment
- Figure 1. The amount of residual contamination
- Figure 2. Microscopical images of the healing abutments
- Figure 3. Representative SEM images of healing abutments