Open hour: senin - sabtu 09:00:00 - 20:00:00; minggu & tanggal merah tutup
Several investigators analysed the preferred indications of short dental implants in the posterior mandible or maxilla

Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)

author: Waldemar Reich,Ramona Schweyen,Christian Heinzelmann,Jeremias Hey,Bilal Al-Nawas, Alexander Walter Eckert | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID

Several investigators analysed the preferred indications of short dental implants in the posterior mandible or maxilla and outlined the cost efficiency compared to additional vertical augmentations. In the present trial, we used a new short implant in both jaws and nearly all possible indication categories were represented, which proves the broad versatility (Table 4).

In our study, two implant failures occurred early in the prosthetic period and under loading. In a former systematic review, 11 studies reported more short implant failures before loading, while 7 studies reported more implant failures after loading. Regarding the implant success rate in the present study, it must be considered that the lost implants were associated with difficult surgical conditions. Besides biological failures, in this study cohort, no technical complications were observed. In accordance with earlier comparative studies, it is evident that when using short implants, there is a lower risk of complications compared to augmentation and nerve lateralisation.

Why design modifications? This is a matter of reduction of the healing period, the gain of stability under difficult conditions and increased bone-to-implant contact and the fact that most complications of short implants occur in the preprosthetic period. It is also a question of long-term crestal bone stability. Earlier biomechanical finite-element studies confirmed that apical expansion results in favourable stress reduction in the crestal bone of nearly 10%. It is assumable that additionally to the microthread and platform-switching concept, the periimplant bone strain could be reduced by apical expansion. This issue requires separate consideration in further studies. The employed implant design (especially its 7-mm length) combines several favourable biomechanical features, which were considered in this study (Fig. 1a,d).

According to Gehrke and co-authors, and in relation to the present study, the apical implant design influences the implant stability and bone-to-implant contact. 

Serial posts:


id post:
New thoughts
Me:
search
glossary
en in