Patient recruitment
Table 2 Surgical treatment protocol
author: Waldemar Reich,Ramona Schweyen,Christian Heinzelmann,Jeremias Hey,Bilal Al-Nawas, Alexander Walter Eckert | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Surgical protocol
Bone quality
D1
D2
D3
D4
1. Drilling sequence (splint)
Last drill
Last drill
Second to last drill
Second to last drill
2. Condensing preparation
–
–
(Analogue to last drill)
Analogue to last drill
3. Implant insertion (maximum torque ≤ 40 N cm)
4. Expansion (maximum torque ≤ 40 N cm)
5. Evaluation of primary stability by resonance frequency analysis, primary wound closure
6. Postoperative digital radiogram
7. Re-entry after a conventional period of submerged healing (mandible 3 months, maxilla 6 months), evaluation of secondary stability by resonance frequency analysis and insertion of healing abutments
8. Postoperative digital radiogram
Serial posts:
-
Novel expandable short dental implants with reduced vertical bone height
-
Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Results : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (3)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (4)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (5)
-
Table 1 Patient recruitment
-
Table 2 Surgical treatment protocol
-
Table 3 Prosthetic treatment protocol
-
Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
-
Figure 1. a Closed short expandable dental implant
-
Figure 2. Cumulative implant survival over the follow-up period
-
Figure 3. a Primary implant stability
-
Figure 4 a–h Prosthetic restauration—follow-up examination. Intraoral and perioral views of a rehabilitated female patient. (She asked explicitly only for implantological treatment in the mandible.)
-
Figure 5 Postoperative orthopantomogram
| Surgical protocol | Bone quality | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | |
| 1. Drilling sequence (splint) | Last drill | Last drill | Second to last drill | Second to last drill |
| 2. Condensing preparation | – | – | (Analogue to last drill) | Analogue to last drill |
| 3. Implant insertion (maximum torque ≤ 40 N cm) | ||||
| 4. Expansion (maximum torque ≤ 40 N cm) | ||||
| 5. Evaluation of primary stability by resonance frequency analysis, primary wound closure | ||||
| 6. Postoperative digital radiogram | ||||
| 7. Re-entry after a conventional period of submerged healing (mandible 3 months, maxilla 6 months), evaluation of secondary stability by resonance frequency analysis and insertion of healing abutments | ||||
| 8. Postoperative digital radiogram | ||||
- Novel expandable short dental implants with reduced vertical bone height
- Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Results : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (4)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (5)
- Table 1 Patient recruitment
- Table 2 Surgical treatment protocol
- Table 3 Prosthetic treatment protocol
- Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
- Figure 1. a Closed short expandable dental implant
- Figure 2. Cumulative implant survival over the follow-up period
- Figure 3. a Primary implant stability
- Figure 4 a–h Prosthetic restauration—follow-up examination. Intraoral and perioral views of a rehabilitated female patient. (She asked explicitly only for implantological treatment in the mandible.)
- Figure 5 Postoperative orthopantomogram