Patient recruitment
Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
author: Waldemar Reich,Ramona Schweyen,Christian Heinzelmann,Jeremias Hey,Bilal Al-Nawas, Alexander Walter Eckert | publisher: drg. Andreas Tjandra, Sp. Perio, FISID
Patient
Sex
Age (years)
Implant position (FDI)
Indication categorya
Bone quality
Prosthetic treatment
Follow-up (months)
Implant failure
1. T. I.
F
80
Maxilla 15, 13, 11, 21, 25 (Σ = 5)
IIa
D4
Telescope
37
n = 1c
2. G. S.
F
65
Mandible 34, 32, 42, 44 (Σ = 4)
IIIb
D1
Ball attachment
34
None
3. S. Sa.
F
64
Maxilla 14, 12, 22, 24 (Σ = 4)
IIIab
D4
Jaw bar
34
None
4. Th. F.
M
76
Mandible 35, 36, 37 (Σ = 3)
IIb
D1
Bridge
33
None
5. A. M.
F
44
Maxilla 16, 15, 14 (Σ = 3)
IIa
D3
Bridge
32
None
6. S. M.
M
53
Maxilla 16, 14, 12 (Σ = 3)
IIa
D3
Ball attachment
32
n = 1d
7. K. S.
F
52
Mandible 35, 36, 37 (Σ = 3)
IIb
D2
Bridge
29
None
8. R. C.
F
59
Mandible 35, 36 (Σ = 2)
IIb
D2
Bridge
24
None
9. W. K.
F
72
Mandible 47, 45, 43 (Σ = 3)
IIb
D2
Bridge
23
None
Serial posts:
-
Novel expandable short dental implants with reduced vertical bone height
-
Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Results : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (3)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (4)
-
Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (5)
-
Table 1 Patient recruitment
-
Table 2 Surgical treatment protocol
-
Table 3 Prosthetic treatment protocol
-
Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
-
Figure 1. a Closed short expandable dental implant
-
Figure 2. Cumulative implant survival over the follow-up period
-
Figure 3. a Primary implant stability
-
Figure 4 a–h Prosthetic restauration—follow-up examination. Intraoral and perioral views of a rehabilitated female patient. (She asked explicitly only for implantological treatment in the mandible.)
-
Figure 5 Postoperative orthopantomogram
| Patient | Sex | Age (years) | Implant position (FDI) | Indication categorya | Bone quality | Prosthetic treatment | Follow-up (months) | Implant failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. T. I. | F | 80 | Maxilla 15, 13, 11, 21, 25 (Σ = 5) | IIa | D4 | Telescope | 37 | n = 1c |
| 2. G. S. | F | 65 | Mandible 34, 32, 42, 44 (Σ = 4) | IIIb | D1 | Ball attachment | 34 | None |
| 3. S. Sa. | F | 64 | Maxilla 14, 12, 22, 24 (Σ = 4) | IIIab | D4 | Jaw bar | 34 | None |
| 4. Th. F. | M | 76 | Mandible 35, 36, 37 (Σ = 3) | IIb | D1 | Bridge | 33 | None |
| 5. A. M. | F | 44 | Maxilla 16, 15, 14 (Σ = 3) | IIa | D3 | Bridge | 32 | None |
| 6. S. M. | M | 53 | Maxilla 16, 14, 12 (Σ = 3) | IIa | D3 | Ball attachment | 32 | n = 1d |
| 7. K. S. | F | 52 | Mandible 35, 36, 37 (Σ = 3) | IIb | D2 | Bridge | 29 | None |
| 8. R. C. | F | 59 | Mandible 35, 36 (Σ = 2) | IIb | D2 | Bridge | 24 | None |
| 9. W. K. | F | 72 | Mandible 47, 45, 43 (Σ = 3) | IIb | D2 | Bridge | 23 | None |
- Novel expandable short dental implants with reduced vertical bone height
- Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Introduction : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Material & methods : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Results : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (1)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (2)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (3)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (4)
- Discussion : Novel expandable short dental implants (5)
- Table 1 Patient recruitment
- Table 2 Surgical treatment protocol
- Table 3 Prosthetic treatment protocol
- Table 4 Clinical characteristics of the study cohort
- Figure 1. a Closed short expandable dental implant
- Figure 2. Cumulative implant survival over the follow-up period
- Figure 3. a Primary implant stability
- Figure 4 a–h Prosthetic restauration—follow-up examination. Intraoral and perioral views of a rehabilitated female patient. (She asked explicitly only for implantological treatment in the mandible.)
- Figure 5 Postoperative orthopantomogram