References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
Jacobi-Gresser E, Huesker K, Schutt S. Genetic and immunological markers predict titanium implant failure: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(4):537–43.
Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(1):27–36.
Shulte W. The intra-osseous Al2O3 (Frialit) Tuebingen implant. Developmental status after eight years (I). Quintessence Int. 1984;15(1):9.
Steflik DE, Lake FT, Sisk AL, Parr GR, Hanes PJ, Davis HC, et al. A comparative investigation in dogs: 2-year morphometric results of the dental implant—bone interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11(1):15–25.
Berge TI, Gronningsaeter AG. Survival of single crystal sapphire implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(2):154–62.
Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81–100.
Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4):347–59.
Grötz KA, Wahlmann UW, Krummenauer F, Wegener J, Al-Nawas B, Kuffner H-D, et al. Prognosis and factors affecting prognosis for enossal implants in the irradiated jaw. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1999;3(1):S117–S24.
Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70.
Karamian E, Khandan A, Motamedi MR, Mirmohammadi H. Surface characteristics and bioactivity of a novel natural HA/zircon nanocomposite coated on dental implants. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:410627.
Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(4):198–206.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–84.
Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Dean DD, Boyan BD. The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996;7(4):329–45.
Serial posts:
- Abstract : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Background : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Methods : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Results : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- Discussion : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Conclusions : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Abbreviations : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [1]
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [2]
- References : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants [3]
- Author information : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Ethics declarations : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Rights and permissions : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- About this article : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 1 Five commercially available ceramic implants and surface characteristics : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 2 EDX : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Table 3 Roughness analysis : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implants
- Fig. 1. Diagram of different implant areas used for sampling. 1) Machined (untreated) area. 2) rough (treated) area : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 2. SEM. White arrow (→) exemplary mark the droplet like shape of surface as described in the text : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 3. SEM for localization of EDX analysis : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 4. CLSM : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 5. 3D profile : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant
- Fig. 6. Roughness (Sa) box plot : In vitro surface characteristics and impurity analysis of five different commercially available dental zirconia implant